{"id":152,"date":"2019-04-03T18:09:56","date_gmt":"2019-04-03T18:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152"},"modified":"2019-04-03T18:09:56","modified_gmt":"2019-04-03T18:09:56","slug":"kuray-et-autres-c-turquie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152","title":{"rendered":"KURAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Communiqu\u00e9e le 10 janvier 2019<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">DEUXI\u00c8ME SECTION<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Requ\u00eate no53866\/11<br \/>\nOrhanKURAY et autres<br \/>\ncontre la Turquie<br \/>\nintroduite le 18 juillet 2011<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">OBJET DE L\u2019AFFAIRE<\/p>\n<p>La requ\u00eate concerne essentiellement la soumission \u00e0 la condition de r\u00e9ciprocit\u00e9 de l\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re par voie de succession des non-nationaux.<\/p>\n<p>Les deux premiers requ\u00e9rants AlexandrosKargoticTripos et Tatiana KargoticPapadimitru, deux ressortissants p\u00e9ruviens, h\u00e9rit\u00e8rent des deux tiers d\u2019un appartement situ\u00e9 \u00e0 Istanbul, \u00e0 la suite du d\u00e9c\u00e8s d\u2019Alice Tripo, leur grand-m\u00e8re. Cette derni\u00e8re, de nationalit\u00e9 grecque, avait elle-m\u00eame acquis ces parts par voie de succession.<\/p>\n<p>Les int\u00e9ress\u00e9s vendirent leurs parts dans l\u2019appartement au troisi\u00e8me requ\u00e9rant, un ressortissant turc.<\/p>\n<p>Par la suite, les tribunaux annul\u00e8rent le transfert de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 Alice Tripo au motif que la condition de r\u00e9ciprocit\u00e9 entre la Gr\u00e8ce et la Turquie n\u2019\u00e9tait pas remplie. Par voie de cons\u00e9quence, tous les transferts subs\u00e9quents, y compris la vente au troisi\u00e8me requ\u00e9rant, furent annul\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Les requ\u00e9rants se plaignent d\u2019une atteinte \u00e0 leur droit de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 au sens de l\u2019article 1 du Protocole no 1.<\/p>\n<p>QUESTIONS AUX PARTIES<\/p>\n<p>1.\u00a0\u00a0Le requ\u00e9rant OrhanKuray a-t-il \u00e9puis\u00e9 toutes les voies de recours internes\u00a0au sens de l\u2019article 35 de la Convention ?<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0\u00a0A la lumi\u00e8re des affairesApostolidi et autres c. Turquie, no\u00a045628\/99, 27\u00a0mars 2007 et Nacaryan et Deryanc. Turquie, nos 19558\/02 et 27904\/02, 8\u00a0janvier 2008, l\u2019ing\u00e9rence dans le droit des requ\u00e9rants au respect de leur bien a-t-elle respect\u00e9 les conditions de l\u2019article 1 du Protocole no 1\u00a0?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">ANNEXE<\/p>\n<p>1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Tatiana KARGOTI\u00c7 PAPADIMITRIU est une ressortissante p\u00e9ruvienne n\u00e9e en 1958, r\u00e9sidant \u00e0 Ath\u00e8nes (Gr\u00e8ce) et repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par Osman Kuray, avocat \u00e0 \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Alexander KARGOTI\u00c7 TRIPAS est un ressortissant p\u00e9ruvien n\u00e9 en 1960, r\u00e9sidant \u00e0 Oberiberg (Suisse) et repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par Osman Kuray, avocat \u00e0 \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n<p>3.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Orhan KURAY est un ressortissant turc n\u00e9 en 1970, r\u00e9sidant \u00e0 \u0130stanbul (Turquie) et repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par Osman Kuray, avocat \u00e0 \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n<div class=\"social-share-buttons\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Facebook<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152&text=KURAY+ET+AUTRES+c.+TURQUIE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Twitter<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152&title=KURAY+ET+AUTRES+c.+TURQUIE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LinkedIn<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pinterest.com\/pin\/create\/button\/?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152&description=KURAY+ET+AUTRES+c.+TURQUIE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pinterest<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Communiqu\u00e9e le 10 janvier 2019 DEUXI\u00c8ME SECTION Requ\u00eate no53866\/11 OrhanKURAY et autres contre la Turquie introduite le 18 juillet 2011 OBJET DE L\u2019AFFAIRE La requ\u00eate concerne essentiellement la soumission \u00e0 la condition de r\u00e9ciprocit\u00e9 de l\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=152\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-echr-available-in-french"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=152"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":153,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152\/revisions\/153"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}