Information Note on the Court\u2019s case-law 255
\nOctober 2021<\/p>\n
Zambrano v. France (dec.)<\/strong> – 41994\/21<\/p>\n Decision 7.10.2021 [Section V]<\/p>\n Article 35<\/strong> Article 3<\/strong> Article 34<\/strong> Article 35<\/strong> The text of the document is available only in French<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\nArticle 35-3-a<\/strong>
\nAbuse of the right of application<\/strong>
\nCall to \u201cparalyse\u201d the Court by submitting a very high number of applications, using an automatically generated form on the applicant\u2019s internet site and copying his application: inadmissible<\/p>\n
\nDegrading treatment<\/strong>
\nInhuman treatment<\/strong>
\nNo obligatory vaccination against Covid-19 for individuals who are not subject to compulsory vaccination, as a result of the introduction of the health pass: inadmissible<\/p>\n
\nVictim<\/strong>
\nApplication complaining in abstracto about the health pass system and other measures for managing the Covid-19 crisis, without specifying their effect on the applicant\u2019s personal situation: inadmissible<\/p>\n
\nArticle 35-1<\/strong>
\nExhaustion of domestic remedies<\/strong>
\nNon-exhaustion of judicial review as a remedy in order to challenge the health pass system and other measures for managing the Covid-19 crisis: inadmissible<\/p>\n