{"id":18416,"date":"2022-04-21T14:36:45","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:36:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416"},"modified":"2022-04-21T14:36:45","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:36:45","slug":"case-of-miladinov-against-serbia-and-2-other-cases-european-court-of-human-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF MILADINOV AGAINST SERBIA AND 2 OTHER CASES (European Court of Human Rights)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Resolution CM\/ResDH (2022) 102<br \/>\nExecution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights<br \/>\nThree cases against Serbia<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2022<br \/>\nat the 1432nd meeting of the Ministers&#8217; Deputies)<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\"><strong>Application No. <\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"359\"><strong>Case<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"153\"><strong>Date of the decision<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">17469\/19<\/td>\n<td width=\"359\">Canko MILADINOV AND 6 OTHER APPLICATIONS<\/td>\n<td width=\"153\">08\/04\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">52451\/20<\/td>\n<td width=\"359\">Ismeta RU\u0160OVI\u0106 AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS<\/td>\n<td width=\"153\">23\/09\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"121\">44325\/20<\/td>\n<td width=\"359\">Milosav BIJORAC<\/td>\n<td width=\"153\">21\/10\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<\/table>\n<p>The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter \u201cthe Convention\u201d and \u201cthe Court\u201d),<\/p>\n<p>Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;<\/p>\n<p>Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State (see document DH-DD(2022)182),<\/p>\n<p>DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and<\/p>\n<p>DECIDES to close their examination.<\/p>\n<div class=\"social-share-buttons\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Facebook<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416&text=CASE+OF+MILADINOV+AGAINST+SERBIA+AND+2+OTHER+CASES+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Twitter<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416&title=CASE+OF+MILADINOV+AGAINST+SERBIA+AND+2+OTHER+CASES+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LinkedIn<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pinterest.com\/pin\/create\/button\/?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416&description=CASE+OF+MILADINOV+AGAINST+SERBIA+AND+2+OTHER+CASES+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pinterest<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Resolution CM\/ResDH (2022) 102 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Three cases against Serbia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2022 at the 1432nd meeting of the Ministers&#8217; Deputies) Application No. Case&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18416\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-available-in-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18416"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18417,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18416\/revisions\/18417"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}