{"id":18418,"date":"2022-04-21T14:38:36","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:38:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418"},"modified":"2022-04-21T14:38:36","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:38:36","slug":"case-of-rudinac-and-others-against-serbia-european-court-of-human-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF RUDINAC AND OTHERS AGAINST SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Resolution CM\/ResDH (2022) 103<br \/>\nExecution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights<br \/>\nMiljana Rudinac and 21 other applications against Serbia<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2022<br \/>\nat the 1432nd meeting of the Ministers&#8217; Deputies)<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"130\"><strong>Application No. <\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"350\"><strong>Case<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"153\"><strong>Date of the decision<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"130\">55077\/18+<\/td>\n<td width=\"350\">Miljana RUDINAC AND 21 OTHER APPLICATIONS<\/td>\n<td width=\"153\">04\/02\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<\/table>\n<p>The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter \u201cthe Convention\u201d and \u201cthe Court\u201d),<\/p>\n<p>Considering that in this case the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike this case from its list;<\/p>\n<p>Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlement were executed by the government of the respondent State,<\/p>\n<p>DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and<\/p>\n<p>DECIDES to close its examination.<\/p>\n<div class=\"social-share-buttons\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Facebook<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418&text=CASE+OF+RUDINAC+AND+OTHERS+AGAINST+SERBIA+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Twitter<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418&title=CASE+OF+RUDINAC+AND+OTHERS+AGAINST+SERBIA+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LinkedIn<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/pinterest.com\/pin\/create\/button\/?url=https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418&description=CASE+OF+RUDINAC+AND+OTHERS+AGAINST+SERBIA+%28European+Court+of+Human+Rights%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pinterest<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Resolution CM\/ResDH (2022) 103 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Miljana Rudinac and 21 other applications against Serbia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2022 at the 1432nd meeting of the Ministers&#8217;&hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link-p\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18418\">Read more &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-available-in-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18418"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18419,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18418\/revisions\/18419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}