{"id":18420,"date":"2022-04-21T14:40:12","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:40:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18420"},"modified":"2022-04-21T14:40:12","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T14:40:12","slug":"case-of-sivi-against-turkey-and-7-other-cases-european-court-of-human-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=18420","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF SIVI AGAINST TURKEY AND 7 OTHER CASES (European Court of Human Rights)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Resolution CM\/ResDH (2022) 105
\nExecution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
\nEight cases against Turkey<\/p>\n

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2022
\nat the 1432nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Application No. <\/strong><\/td>\nCase<\/strong><\/td>\nDate of the decision<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10334\/18<\/td>\nFatih SIVI<\/td>\n10\/11\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10531\/18<\/td>\nMustafa FESLI AND Mehmet ARDIC<\/td>\n26\/08\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21988\/10<\/td>\n\u0130brahim FIRAT<\/td>\n06\/07\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35996\/20<\/td>\nMustafa \u015eAHIN AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS<\/td>\n09\/09\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39600\/10<\/td>\nHakan Burak TOKAT AND OTHERS<\/td>\n21\/10\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39854\/11<\/td>\nYavuz AKIN AND OTHERS<\/td>\n23\/09\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47978\/18<\/td>\nErol \u00c7I\u00c7EK AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS<\/td>\n26\/08\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7266\/19<\/td>\nHidayet AY<\/td>\n23\/09\/2021<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<\/table>\n

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter \u201cthe Convention\u201d and \u201cthe Court\u201d),<\/p>\n

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;<\/p>\n

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,<\/p>\n

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and<\/p>\n

DECIDES to close their examination.<\/p>\n