{"id":19869,"date":"2022-10-18T16:34:53","date_gmt":"2022-10-18T16:34:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=19869"},"modified":"2022-10-18T16:34:53","modified_gmt":"2022-10-18T16:34:53","slug":"case-of-sevinc-and-others-v-turkiye-european-court-of-human-rights-63634-16-and-134-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=19869","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF SEVIN\u00c7 AND OTHERS v. T\u00dcRKIYE (European Court of Human Rights) 63634\/16 and 134 others"},"content":{"rendered":"

The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15\u00a0July2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the \u201cFetullahist Terror Organisation \/ Parallel State Structure\u201d, which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt.<\/p>\n

\n

SECOND SECTION
\nCASE OF SEV\u0130N\u00c7 AND OTHERS v. T\u00dcRK\u0130YE<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 63634\/16 and 134 others see appended list)<\/em>
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n18 October 2022<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Sevin\u00e7 and Others v. T\u00fcrkiye,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nBranko Lubarda, President,
\nJovan Ilievski,
\nDiana S\u00e2rcu, judges,
\nand Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having regard to:<\/p>\n

the applications against the Republic of T\u00fcrkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) by one hundred and thirty-five Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (\u201cthe applicants\u201d), on the various dates indicated therein;<\/p>\n

the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the lawfulness and length of pre-trial detention and the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of prompt information of the reasons for the applicants\u2019 arrest and of any charge against them, as well as the ineffectiveness of judicial review of the lawfulness of detention, the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation and the lawfulness of the searches conducted by the authorities to the Turkish Government (\u201cthe Government\u201d) represented by their Agent, Mr Hac\u0131 Ali A\u00e7\u0131kg\u00fcl, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of T\u00fcrkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;<\/p>\n

the parties\u2019 observations;<\/p>\n

the decision to reject the Government\u2019s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 27 September 2022,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15\u00a0July2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the \u201cFetullahist Terror Organisation \/ Parallel State Structure\u201d (Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc \/ Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131, hereinafter referred to as \u201cFET\u00d6\/PDY\u201d), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of Ba\u015f v. Turkey, no.\u00a066448\/17, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a06\u201114 and \u00a7\u00a7\u00a0109-10, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as ordinary judges or prosecutors at different types and\/or levels of court, subject to Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors (\u201cLaw no. 2802\u201d) (see Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a066-67), at the material time.<\/p>\n

2. On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor\u2019s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios, the suspected members of FET\u00d6\/PDY within the judiciary in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor\u2019s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FET\u00d6\/PDY, may be found in Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7\u00a7 9-10 and 15-21).<\/p>\n

3. Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors\u2019 offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FET\u00d6\/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates\u2019 courts located at the respective places of the applicants\u2019 arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a \u201ccontinuing offence\u201d and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7 67).<\/p>\n

4. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and a few were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.<\/p>\n

5. In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia, the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (compare also Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos.\u00a075805\/16 and 426\u00a0others, \u00a7\u00a7 26-27, 23\u00a0November 2021).<\/p>\n

THE COURT\u2019S ASSESSMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE\u00a05 \u00a7 1 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. The applicants complained under Article 5 \u00a7 1 of the Convention that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 (see Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7 67).<\/p>\n

8. The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and\u00a0Others (cited above, \u00a7 55). They also added that one of the applicants (application no. 38986\/19) had been granted some compensation by the Constitutional Court, which had found that the said applicant\u2019s detention had not been based on a reasonable suspicion. The Court notes that similar objections raised by the Government have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a057-64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. It notes in particular the absence of any finding in respect of the applicant in application no.\u00a038986\/19 constituting an acknowledgement that his placement in pre-trial detention had not been in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law and thereby removing his victim status in that regard. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article\u00a035 \u00a7\u00a03\u00a0(a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.<\/p>\n

9. The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of Ba\u015f and Turan and Others (both cited above, \u00a7\u00a7 143-58 and \u00a7\u00a7\u00a079-92 respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article\u00a05 \u00a7 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 \u00a7 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants\u2019 initial pre\u2011trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt \u2013 that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by T\u00fcrkiye \u2013, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Ba\u015f, cited above, \u00a7\u00a7 115-16 and\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a0159\u201162, and Turan and Others, cited above, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n

III. OTHER COMPLAINTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

10. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 2, 3, 4 and\u00a05 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 \u00a7 1above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, \u00a7 98).<\/p>\n

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

11. The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non\u2011pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.<\/p>\n

12. The Government contested the applicants\u2019 claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.<\/p>\n

13. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a0102\u201107), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non\u2011pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Declares the complaint under Article 5 \u00a7 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants\u2019 initial pre-trial detention admissible;<\/p>\n

3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 \u00a7 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants;<\/p>\n

4. Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants\u2019 remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 8 of the Convention;<\/p>\n

5. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;<\/p>\n

6. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants\u2019 claim for just satisfaction.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 October 2022, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and 3 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Dorothee von Arnim \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Branko Lubarda
\nDeputy Registrar \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 President<\/p>\n

_________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong><\/p>\n

List of cases:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/td>\nCase name<\/strong><\/td>\nLodged on<\/strong><\/td>\nApplicant
\nDate of Birth<\/strong><\/td>\n		Represented by<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1.<\/td>\n63634\/16<\/td>\nSevin\u00e7 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/10\/2016<\/td>\n\u015eamil SEV\u0130N\u00c7
\n05\/01\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n14439\/17<\/td>\n\u00d6zalp v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n12\/01\/2017<\/td>\nFaruk \u00d6ZALP
\n10\/11\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mesut BA\u015eOL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n14942\/17<\/td>\nUlak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n05\/01\/2017<\/td>\nMustafa Yener ULAK
\n11\/05\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n14976\/17<\/td>\nAltun v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n11\/01\/2017<\/td>\nMustafa ALTUN
\n29\/01\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130rem TATLIDEDE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n34032\/17<\/td>\nSar\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n10\/03\/2017<\/td>\nMehmet SARI
\n01\/01\/1971<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130rem TATLIDEDE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n40177\/17<\/td>\nBekri v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n16\/01\/2017<\/td>\nMuhammet Nedim BEKR\u0130
\n05\/10\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		T\u00fclin BEKR\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n41766\/17<\/td>\n\u00c7ak\u0131r v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n12\/05\/2017<\/td>\nAbdulkadir \u00c7AKIR
\n20\/03\/1971<\/strong><\/td>\n		Zehra KILI\u00c7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n41864\/17<\/td>\n\u00dc\u015f\u00fcmez v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/04\/2017<\/td>\n\u0130zzettin \u00dc\u015e\u00dcMEZ
\n30\/03\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u015eefik KARAKI\u015e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n43739\/17<\/td>\nAcu v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n04\/04\/2017<\/td>\nNedim ACU
\n01\/07\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130rem TATLIDEDE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n45034\/17<\/td>\nBal\u0131k v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n05\/05\/2017<\/td>\n\u0130brahim BALIK
\n02\/07\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		Do\u011fan G\u00fcney YILMAZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n48010\/17<\/td>\n\u00c7akmak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n23\/06\/2017<\/td>\nSeyfullah \u00c7AKMAK
\n22\/03\/1971<\/strong><\/td>\n		G\u00f6khan D\u0130R\u0130CAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\n49244\/17<\/td>\nUslu v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/03\/2017<\/td>\nNihal USLU
\n02\/07\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00d6NC\u00dc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\n58673\/17<\/td>\nOkur v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n20\/07\/2017<\/td>\nOrhan Yavuz OKUR
\n14\/02\/1989<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\n62627\/17<\/td>\nKaraduman v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n15\/06\/2017<\/td>\nMehmet KARADUMAN
\n01\/10\/1991<\/strong><\/td>\n		Sevgi KO\u00c7ER VAROL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\n62735\/17<\/td>\nDede v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/01\/2017<\/td>\nHakan DEDE
\n12\/06\/1968<\/strong><\/td>\n		Elkan ALBAYRAK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\n63197\/17<\/td>\nBinici v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n26\/05\/2017<\/td>\nBurhan B\u0130N\u0130C\u0130
\n26\/01\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		B\u00fc\u015fra B\u0130N\u0130C\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\n63650\/17<\/td>\nKandemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n15\/02\/2017<\/td>\nOsman KANDEM\u0130R
\n07\/02\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ahmet Can DEM\u0130RC\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\n66402\/17<\/td>\nBabayi\u011fit v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n16\/01\/2017<\/td>\nMustafa BABAY\u0130\u011e\u0130T
\n01\/10\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\n67340\/17<\/td>\n\u00dcnal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/08\/2017<\/td>\nKamber \u00dcNAL
\n01\/12\/1968<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\n68205\/17<\/td>\nKay\u0131n v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n13\/01\/2017<\/td>\nMustafa KAYIN
\n24\/12\/1968<\/strong><\/td>\n		M. Ayta\u00e7 POYRAZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\n69728\/17<\/td>\nMercimek v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/08\/2017<\/td>\nHamza MERC\u0130MEK<\/strong><\/p>\n

20\/11\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n

Memnune AKYILDIZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\n79642\/17<\/td>\nKartal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/10\/2017<\/td>\nKadir KARTAL
\n29\/07\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\n80957\/17<\/td>\n\u015een v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n06\/11\/2017<\/td>\nYavuz \u015eEN
\n03\/03\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		Elif Nurbanu OR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\n6919\/18<\/td>\n\u00c7elik v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n19\/01\/2018<\/td>\nAdem \u00c7EL\u0130K
\n29\/09\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhammed \u00c7EL\u0130K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\n16155\/18<\/td>\n\u00d6zkan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n14\/03\/2018<\/td>\nErcan \u00d6ZKAN
\n04\/04\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\n23455\/18<\/td>\nDemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/04\/2018<\/td>\n\u0130brahim DEM\u0130R
\n24\/03\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\n25201\/18<\/td>\nG\u00fcnal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n26\/05\/2018<\/td>\nErol G\u00dcNAL
\n29\/08\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhammet Talha BOL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\n29932\/18<\/td>\nY\u0131ld\u0131z v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/05\/2018<\/td>\nSerkan YILDIZ
\n15\/10\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\n35634\/18<\/td>\nDemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n13\/07\/2018<\/td>\n\u0130lhami DEM\u0130R
\n15\/06\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Cihat \u00c7ITIR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\n43696\/18<\/td>\n\u0130.\u00d6. v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n11\/09\/2018<\/td>\n\u0130.\u00d6.
\n05\/05\/1988<\/strong><\/td>\n		As\u0131m Burak G\u00dcNE\u015e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\n11854\/19<\/td>\nBekta\u015f v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n04\/02\/2019<\/td>\nHakan BEKTA\u015e
\n01\/03\/1986<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130lhan YILDIZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\n13857\/19<\/td>\nSay\u0131lgan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n08\/03\/2019<\/td>\nCengiz SAYILGAN
\n01\/01\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Menek\u015fe Merve TEKTEN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\n14274\/19<\/td>\n\u015eay\u0131k v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/02\/2019<\/td>\nH\u00fcsn\u00fc Sidal \u015eAYIK
\n19\/06\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\n15881\/19<\/td>\nAkbaba v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n07\/03\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130lhami AKBABA
\n21\/08\/1985<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00d6NC\u00dc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\n15995\/19<\/td>\nUzun v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/01\/2019<\/td>\nSelim UZUN
\n28\/11\/1982<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tufan YILMAZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\n16213\/19<\/td>\nDa\u011fl\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n21\/11\/2018<\/td>\nNeslihan DA\u011eLI
\n04\/06\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\n16424\/19<\/td>\nYediy\u0131ld\u0131z v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/02\/2019<\/td>\nAli Cihan YED\u0130YILDIZ
\n25\/11\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\n17501\/19<\/td>\nBenli v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n11\/03\/2019<\/td>\nSalih BENL\u0130
\n10\/10\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 Seyfettin G\u00d6KDEM\u0130R<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\n17527\/19<\/td>\nAltunbey v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n18\/03\/2019<\/td>\nSameddin ALTUNBEY
\n01\/07\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\n17548\/19<\/td>\nKesim v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n13\/03\/2019<\/td>\nYahya KES\u0130M
\n20\/11\/1965<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\n17780\/19<\/td>\nKaya v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n18\/03\/2019<\/td>\nSalih KAYA
\n10\/04\/1967<\/strong><\/td>\n		Bar\u0131\u015f BAYHAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\n18787\/19<\/td>\nCano\u011flu v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n19\/03\/2019<\/td>\nB\u00fclent CANO\u011eLU
\n01\/03\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Vedi Y\u00dcCETA\u015e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43.<\/td>\n19743\/19<\/td>\nA.B. v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/03\/2019<\/td>\nA.B.
\n07\/01\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		Cihat \u00c7ITIR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44.<\/td>\n20067\/19<\/td>\nUzun v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/03\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet Burak UZUN
\n24\/06\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45.<\/td>\n20293\/19<\/td>\nAcar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/03\/2019<\/td>\nMetin ACAR
\n02\/03\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		Serdar Numan BA\u015eARAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46.<\/td>\n20749\/19<\/td>\nDalk\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n01\/04\/2019<\/td>\nS\u00fcleyman DALKILI\u00c7
\n06\/11\/1989<\/strong><\/td>\n		Meryem YA\u015eAR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47.<\/td>\n21017\/19<\/td>\nKaya v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/04\/2019<\/td>\nAhmet KAYA
\n24\/07\/1966<\/strong><\/td>\n		Afra Ece KAYA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48.<\/td>\n21248\/19<\/td>\nG\u00fcrp\u0131nar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n05\/04\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet Hakk\u0131 G\u00dcRPINAR
\n18\/12\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130lyas TEK\u0130N<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49.<\/td>\n21260\/19<\/td>\nKartal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n12\/04\/2019<\/td>\nAdem KARTAL
\n01\/01\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		Kamile KILDAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50.<\/td>\n21968\/19<\/td>\nAr\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n19\/04\/2019<\/td>\nVahip ARI
\n10\/06\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		Hasan A\u011eIRTA\u015e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51.<\/td>\n22462\/19<\/td>\n\u0130nce v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\nS\u00fcleyman \u0130NCE
\n15\/12\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52.<\/td>\n22482\/19<\/td>\nPehlivan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n12\/04\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130lyas PEHL\u0130VAN
\n27\/08\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53.<\/td>\n22731\/19<\/td>\nBulut v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n09\/04\/2019<\/td>\nNurettin BULUT
\n25\/05\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ay\u015fe Sibel TORUN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
54.<\/td>\n22734\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\nHakan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK
\n03\/03\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Z\u00fclal \u00dcNSAL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
55.<\/td>\n23438\/19<\/td>\nY\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131mer v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n26\/04\/2019<\/td>\nEngin YILDIRIMER
\n20\/01\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56.<\/td>\n23673\/19<\/td>\nAyano\u011flu v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/04\/2019<\/td>\nH\u00fcseyin AYANO\u011eLU
\n20\/11\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130hsan MAKAS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
57.<\/td>\n23953\/19<\/td>\nArslan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/04\/2019<\/td>\nMurat ARSLAN
\n30\/07\/1977<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
58.<\/td>\n24366\/19<\/td>\nAksakal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\nTaner AKSAKAL
\n13\/09\/1970<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ebubekir RENK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
59.<\/td>\n24387\/19<\/td>\n\u00c7avdar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/04\/2019<\/td>\nKemal \u00c7AVDAR
\n09\/09\/1982<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mustafa \u00c7AVDAR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
60.<\/td>\n24668\/19<\/td>\nYenitepe v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/04\/2019<\/td>\nZafer YEN\u0130TEPE
\n04\/12\/1970<\/strong><\/td>\n		Abdullah YAL\u00c7INKAYA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
61.<\/td>\n24755\/19<\/td>\nS\u0131r\u0131kl\u0131gil v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/05\/2019<\/td>\nAli SIRIKLIG\u0130L
\n01\/10\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130hsan MAKAS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
62.<\/td>\n24760\/19<\/td>\nOvac\u0131kl\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/04\/2019<\/td>\nSadullah OVACIKLI
\n18\/12\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
63.<\/td>\n24939\/19<\/td>\nBay\u0131r v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/04\/2019<\/td>\nCan BAYIR
\n16\/04\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
64.<\/td>\n25151\/19<\/td>\nBayman v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n22\/04\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130brahim BAYMAN
\n21\/08\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
65.<\/td>\n25409\/19<\/td>\nKavak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/05\/2019<\/td>\nDurdu KAVAK
\n02\/06\/1965<\/strong><\/td>\n		Hidayet Elif VURAL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
66.<\/td>\n25701\/19<\/td>\nK\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/04\/2019<\/td>\nEy\u00fcp KILI\u00c7
\n02\/06\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		Enes Malik KILI\u00c7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
67.<\/td>\n25759\/19<\/td>\nVarol v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/04\/2019<\/td>\nEsra VAROL
\n05\/04\/1982<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130lyas TEK\u0130N<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
68.<\/td>\n25777\/19<\/td>\nTekkoyun v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/05\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet TEKKOYUN
\n05\/09\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130brahim KOCAO\u011eUL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
69.<\/td>\n25907\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6zdemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\nHasan \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R
\n14\/05\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
70.<\/td>\n25912\/19<\/td>\nTombak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n19\/04\/2019<\/td>\nEren TOMBAK
\n01\/06\/1989<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tufan YILMAZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
71.<\/td>\n26080\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n08\/05\/2019<\/td>\nVeysi \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK
\n12\/10\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ferat \u00c7A\u011eIL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
72.<\/td>\n26282\/19<\/td>\nAyaz v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/04\/2019<\/td>\nEslem AYAZ
\n05\/02\/1982<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
73.<\/td>\n26378\/19<\/td>\nBa\u011f\u0131rc\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n14\/05\/2019<\/td>\nHasan Tar\u0131k BA\u011eIRCI
\n18\/08\/1990<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhammet G\u00dcNEY<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
74.<\/td>\n26525\/19<\/td>\nEt\u00f6z v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/05\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130smail ET\u00d6Z
\n04\/06\/1990<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
75.<\/td>\n26769\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6zcan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n20\/04\/2019<\/td>\nMusa \u00d6ZCAN
\n16\/09\/1985<\/strong><\/td>\n		Sabahattin G\u00d6\u00c7MEN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
76.<\/td>\n27075\/19<\/td>\nY\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/04\/2019<\/td>\nM\u00fckremin YILDIRIM
\n01\/03\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhammet G\u00dcNEY<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
77.<\/td>\n27141\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6cal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n09\/05\/2019<\/td>\nZiya \u00d6CAL
\n16\/02\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		Kaz\u0131m KASA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
78.<\/td>\n27501\/19<\/td>\n\u00c7elik v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n15\/05\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130sa \u00c7EL\u0130K
\n02\/06\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Kamile KILDAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
79.<\/td>\n27577\/19<\/td>\nKavak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n26\/04\/2019<\/td>\nTar\u0131k KAVAK
\n02\/04\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n		G\u00fcnta\u00e7 DE\u011eER<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
80.<\/td>\n27686\/19<\/td>\nArslan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/04\/2019<\/td>\nMustafa ARSLAN
\n08\/04\/1988<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
81.<\/td>\n27739\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6z\u00e7elik v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n30\/04\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130lkay \u00d6Z\u00c7EL\u0130K
\n12\/01\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
82.<\/td>\n28703\/19<\/td>\nYeti\u015fgen v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/05\/2019<\/td>\nResul YET\u0130\u015eGEN
\n01\/04\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ahmet OKU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
83.<\/td>\n28935\/19<\/td>\nToltar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n07\/05\/2019<\/td>\nYusuf TOLTAR
\n11\/02\/1988<\/strong><\/td>\n		Emre AKARYILDIZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
84.<\/td>\n28963\/19<\/td>\n\u015eenses v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n15\/05\/2019<\/td>\n\u00dcmit \u015eENSES
\n21\/06\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		Sinan KARAHAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
85.<\/td>\n29438\/19<\/td>\nAyd\u0131n v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n10\/05\/2019<\/td>\nAykut AYDIN
\n22\/12\/1990<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
86.<\/td>\n30478\/19<\/td>\nOru\u00e7 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/05\/2019<\/td>\nBahad\u0131r ORU\u00c7
\n01\/04\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		Cengiz BALCI<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
87.<\/td>\n30481\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6nder v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/05\/2019<\/td>\nYusuf \u00d6NDER
\n20\/02\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Celal S\u00d6YLEMEZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
88.<\/td>\n30485\/19<\/td>\nDal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n10\/05\/2019<\/td>\nHasan Tahsin DAL
\n01\/01\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		Nurhan \u00d6ZDURAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89.<\/td>\n30865\/19<\/td>\nOcak v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n\u00dcmit OCAK
\n30\/10\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Kamile KILDAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90.<\/td>\n31626\/19<\/td>\nUysal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n20\/05\/2019<\/td>\n\u00d6mer UYSAL
\n16\/06\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
91.<\/td>\n32316\/19<\/td>\nBozkurt v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n10\/06\/2019<\/td>\nYeliz BOZKURT
\n01\/03\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhterem SAYAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
92.<\/td>\n32943\/19<\/td>\nAyd\u0131n v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/05\/2019<\/td>\nU\u011fur AYDIN
\n08\/06\/1984<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
93.<\/td>\n33224\/19<\/td>\nAcar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n07\/06\/2019<\/td>\nBilal ACAR
\n13\/01\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
94.<\/td>\n34173\/19<\/td>\nYurt v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/06\/2019<\/td>\nBahattin YURT
\n01\/07\/1975<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130rem TATLIDEDE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
95.<\/td>\n35008\/19<\/td>\nKayalar v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/07\/2019<\/td>\nYasin KAYALAR
\n12\/10\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Engin KARA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
96.<\/td>\n35059\/19<\/td>\nAyd\u0131n v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/07\/2019<\/td>\nAdem AYDIN
\n22\/05\/1988<\/strong><\/td>\n		Fatma Serpil AYDIN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
97.<\/td>\n35075\/19<\/td>\nY\u00fccel v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n02\/07\/2019<\/td>\nS\u0131rr\u0131 Y\u00dcCEL
\n17\/02\/1971<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00c7AVDAR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
98.<\/td>\n35089\/19<\/td>\nArslan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n14\/06\/2019<\/td>\nMahmut ARSLAN
\n15\/01\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130hsan MAKAS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
99.<\/td>\n35107\/19<\/td>\nDevran v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/06\/2019<\/td>\nTalha DEVRAN
\n25\/10\/1990<\/strong><\/td>\n		Sultan TEKE SOYD\u0130N\u00c7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
100.<\/td>\n35366\/19<\/td>\nBozo\u011flu v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/06\/2019<\/td>\n\u00d6mer BOZO\u011eLU
\n18\/01\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00c7AVDAR<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
101.<\/td>\n35588\/19<\/td>\nAl\u0131c\u0131 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n25\/06\/2019<\/td>\nCebrail Cem ALICI
\n10\/01\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		Sefanur BOZG\u00d6Z<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
102.<\/td>\n35824\/19<\/td>\nGemici v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n31\/05\/2019<\/td>\nRemzi GEM\u0130C\u0130
\n02\/08\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
103.<\/td>\n35885\/19<\/td>\nDemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n18\/06\/2019<\/td>\nTimur DEM\u0130R
\n24\/09\/1977<\/strong><\/td>\n		Handan CAN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
104.<\/td>\n35891\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6zdemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/06\/2019<\/td>\nAli \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R
\n04\/04\/1976<\/strong><\/td>\n		Fatma KOCAEL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
105.<\/td>\n36055\/19<\/td>\nG\u00f6kg\u00f6z v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/06\/2019<\/td>\nMustafa G\u00d6KG\u00d6Z
\n01\/05\/1965<\/strong><\/td>\n		Tar\u0131k Said G\u00dcLD\u0130B\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
106.<\/td>\n36208\/19<\/td>\nDo\u011fan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n21\/06\/2019<\/td>\nErdem DO\u011eAN
\n06\/08\/1977<\/strong><\/td>\n		Muhammet G\u00dcNEY<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
107.<\/td>\n36383\/19<\/td>\nYal\u00e7\u0131nkaya v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/06\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet Arif YAL\u00c7INKAYA
\n17\/11\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00d6NC\u00dc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
108.<\/td>\n36783\/19<\/td>\nDemirel v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/06\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130rfan DEM\u0130REL
\n20\/03\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Oktay B\u0130LG\u0130N<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
109.<\/td>\n36828\/19<\/td>\nAyd\u0131n v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n01\/07\/2019<\/td>\nEmin AYDIN
\n15\/08\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet AK\u00c7AKOCA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
110.<\/td>\n36871\/19<\/td>\nEjder v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n01\/07\/2019<\/td>\nMuhammet Emre EJDER
\n06\/04\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u00d6zcan AKINCI<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
111.<\/td>\n37238\/19<\/td>\nAyta\u00e7 v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n03\/07\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130smail AYTA\u00c7
\n01\/08\/1973<\/strong><\/td>\n		Emin BAYRAM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
112.<\/td>\n37749\/19<\/td>\nEr\u00f6z v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130smail Hakk\u0131 ER\u00d6Z
\n22\/02\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Leman TALASLIO\u011eLU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
113.<\/td>\n38054\/19<\/td>\nTansel v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/06\/2019<\/td>\nFerhat TANSEL
\n08\/01\/1977<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mevlit ERM\u0130\u015e<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
114.<\/td>\n38392\/19<\/td>\n\u00c7atal v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n16\/07\/2019<\/td>\nAli \u00c7ATAL
\n16\/09\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		T. Mertcan SEYMEN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
115.<\/td>\n38449\/19<\/td>\n\u00c7abuk v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n05\/07\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet \u00c7ABUK
\n01\/03\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
116.<\/td>\n38528\/19<\/td>\nAyan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n04\/07\/2019<\/td>\nMahmut AYAN
\n05\/01\/1981<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
117.<\/td>\n38986\/19<\/td>\nDemir v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n09\/07\/2019<\/td>\nNuran DEM\u0130R
\n10\/03\/1979<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
118.<\/td>\n39217\/19<\/td>\nTanr\u0131\u00f6ver v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n10\/07\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet TANRI\u00d6VER
\n30\/07\/1985<\/strong><\/td>\n		Veysel MALKO\u00c7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
119.<\/td>\n39485\/19<\/td>\nKara v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n12\/07\/2019<\/td>\nEngin KARA
\n09\/09\/1985<\/strong><\/td>\n		Onur G\u00dcNDEM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
120.<\/td>\n39599\/19<\/td>\nY\u0131lmaz v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n09\/07\/2019<\/td>\nMustafa YILMAZ
\n09\/10\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mustafa Emre \u015eAH\u0130N<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
121.<\/td>\n39778\/19<\/td>\nDo\u011fan v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n19\/07\/2019<\/td>\nLokman DO\u011eAN
\n13\/08\/1971<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
122.<\/td>\n40949\/19<\/td>\nYavuz v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n17\/07\/2019<\/td>\nH\u00fcseyin YAVUZ
\n10\/08\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		Ahmet \u00c7EV\u0130K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
123.<\/td>\n41060\/19<\/td>\nBaki v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n20\/07\/2019<\/td>\nB\u00fclent BAK\u0130
\n19\/12\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Elkan ALBAYRAK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
124.<\/td>\n41129\/19<\/td>\nG\u00fcrsoy F\u0131rat v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n22\/07\/2019<\/td>\nG\u00fcl\u00fczar G\u00dcRSOY FIRAT
\n12\/04\/1972<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u0130rem TATLIDEDE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
125.<\/td>\n41261\/19<\/td>\nKuvel v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n22\/07\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130lyas KUVEL
\n01\/11\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		Emre AKARYILDIZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
126.<\/td>\n41667\/19<\/td>\nG\u00fcrel Ayg\u00fcn v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/05\/2019<\/td>\nNur G\u00dcREL AYG\u00dcN
\n28\/07\/1988<\/strong><\/td>\n		Yasemin BAL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
127.<\/td>\n42065\/19<\/td>\nR.M. v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n22\/07\/2019<\/td>\nR.M.
\n09\/04\/1969<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet \u00d6NC\u00dc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
128.<\/td>\n42479\/19<\/td>\nEr v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/07\/2019<\/td>\nFatih ER
\n29\/03\/1975<\/strong><\/td>\n		Bekir D\u00d6NMEZ<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
129.<\/td>\n42974\/19<\/td>\n\u015eeng\u00fcl v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n29\/07\/2019<\/td>\n\u00d6mer \u015eENG\u00dcL
\n22\/01\/1978<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mahmut \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
130.<\/td>\n43617\/19<\/td>\n\u00d6z\u00e7elik v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n01\/07\/2019<\/td>\nYusuf \u00d6Z\u00c7EL\u0130K
\n14\/07\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Adnan ZEYBEK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
131.<\/td>\n44708\/19<\/td>\nAkyol v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n09\/08\/2019<\/td>\nRamazan AKYOL
\n15\/11\/1970<\/strong><\/td>\n		Yakup TA\u015eCI<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
132.<\/td>\n47050\/19<\/td>\nSar\u0131kaya v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n28\/08\/2019<\/td>\nRamazan SARIKAYA
\n15\/07\/1982<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mahmut \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
133.<\/td>\n48100\/19<\/td>\nNas v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n24\/08\/2019<\/td>\nMehmet Ra\u015fit NAS
\n11\/12\/1983<\/strong><\/td>\n		Mehmet Akif CANPOLAT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
134.<\/td>\n51627\/19<\/td>\n\u015eahin v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n27\/08\/2019<\/td>\n\u0130brahim \u015eAH\u0130N
\n05\/12\/1980<\/strong><\/td>\n		\u00d6mer Faruk ERG\u00dcN<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
135.<\/td>\n51686\/19<\/td>\n\u00c7ivi v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/td>\n01\/10\/2019<\/td>\nErdin\u00e7 \u00c7\u0130V\u0130
\n29\/08\/1974<\/strong><\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n