{"id":20833,"date":"2023-04-27T08:40:21","date_gmt":"2023-04-27T08:40:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=20833"},"modified":"2023-04-27T08:40:21","modified_gmt":"2023-04-27T08:40:21","slug":"case-of-karpov-and-others-v-russia-11042-19-and-49-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=20833","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF KARPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 11042\/19 and 49 others"},"content":{"rendered":"

FIRST SECTION
\nCASE OF KARPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 11042\/19 and 49 others \u2013 see appended list)<\/em>
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n27 April 2023<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Karpov and Others v. Russia,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nL\u0259tif H\u00fcseynov, President,
\nIvana Jeli\u0107,
\nErik Wennerstr\u00f6m, judges,<\/p>\n

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 6 April 2023,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

PROCEDURE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article\u00a034 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

2. The Russian Government (\u201cthe\u00a0Government\u201d) were given notice of the applications.<\/p>\n

THE FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.<\/p>\n

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of country-wide protests against retirement age hike organised by Aleksey Navalnyy on 9 September 2018. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792\/10 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a068\u201173, 17 January 2023).<\/p>\n

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE\u00a011 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and\/or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies, and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no.\u00a037553\/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, ECHR 2006\u2011XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482\/06, 31 March 2009).<\/p>\n

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.<\/p>\n

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants\u2019 freedom of assembly were not \u201cnecessary in a democratic society\u201d.<\/p>\n

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article\u00a035\u00a0\u00a7\u00a03\u00a0(a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.<\/p>\n

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 61-65, 13 February 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to administrative escorting to and detention in a police station beyond three hours without any justification; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-85, 20 September 2016, related to the absence of a prosecuting party in criminal proceedings governed by the Code of Administrative Offences (\u201cthe CAO\u201d).<\/p>\n

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

14. Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.<\/p>\n

15. Firstly, the Court considers that, in view of its findings in paragraphs\u00a011 and 13 above, there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints raised by some applicants under Article 5 of the Convention with regard to their alleged deprivation of liberty and Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings.<\/p>\n

16. Furthermore, the Court has examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.<\/p>\n

17. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article\u00a035\u00a0\u00a7\u00a04 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

18. Article 41 of the Convention provides:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.\u201d<\/p>\n

19. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.\u00a025809\/17 and 14 others, \u00a7 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants\u2019 complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;<\/p>\n

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible,\u00a0finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;<\/p>\n

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article\u00a011 of the Convention;<\/p>\n

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);<\/p>\n

6. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 April 2023, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and\u00a03 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Viktoriya Maradudina \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 L\u0259tif H\u00fcseynov
\nActing Deputy Registrar \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 President<\/p>\n

_____________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong>
\nList of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
\n(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of introduction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Applicant\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Year of birth<\/strong><\/td>\n

Representative\u2019s name and location<\/strong><\/td>\nLocation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Administrative charges<\/strong><\/td>\nPenalty<\/strong><\/td>\nFinal domestic decision<\/strong><\/p>\n

Court Name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date<\/strong><\/td>\n

Other complaints under well-established case-law<\/strong><\/td>\nAmount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[i]<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1.<\/td>\n11042\/19<\/p>\n

06\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Vitaliy Gennadyevich KARPOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

09\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled; arrested at 6.40 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, detention recorded at 7 p.m., released at 10.07 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n12551\/19<\/p>\n

21\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Yelena Aeksandrovna GUSEVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1967<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.50 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, detention recorded at 7 p.m., released at 10.40 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n13234\/19<\/p>\n

21\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Viktorovich MOSALEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1957<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Ufa<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSupreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic<\/p>\n

08\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n13767\/19<\/p>\n

28\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Viktorovich BALDIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.09 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 8.50 p.m., released at unknown time on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n14717\/19<\/p>\n

04\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Konstantinovich PYSTOGOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

community work of 80 hours<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

12\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 8.05 p.m., released at 12.45 p.m. on 11\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n14935\/19<\/p>\n

28\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Antonina Nikolayevna ANUSHINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1981<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

detention of 2 days<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 7.45 p.m., released at 10 a.m. on 11\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n15041\/19<\/p>\n

04\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Vyongovich NGUYEN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

16\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.45 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to a police station at 6.10 p.m., released at 10.07 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n15092\/19<\/p>\n

06\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Vasiliy Mikhaylovich DANILOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Tver<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 15,000<\/td>\nTver Regional Court<\/p>\n

17\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested and brought to police station at 3 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, released at 1.00 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n15403\/19<\/p>\n

11\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Konstantinovich SABREKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

community work of 50 hours<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

22\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 8.55 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n15666\/19<\/p>\n

04\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Kirill Aleksandrovich STRIKHA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

detention of 5 days<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

16\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.30 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 10.40 p.m., released at 10.25 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n16054\/19<\/p>\n

11\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Konstantinovich SABREKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

community work of 60 days<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 8.25 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\n17020\/19<\/p>\n

15\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich PROSKURIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Lipetsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nLipetsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

18\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\n18965\/19<\/p>\n

11\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Konstantin Nasyrovich SABREKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1964<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

community work of 20 hours<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

24\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to a police station at 8.20 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\n19087\/19<\/p>\n

13\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Anatolyevich KULYASOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Lipetsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nLipetsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

18\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

15.<\/td>\n19617\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Mikhail Pavlovich STRIKHAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

1969<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

15\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested and brought to police station at 4 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, released at 8.50 p.m. according to the Government or at 12.30 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018 according to the applicant;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\n19724\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Marina Valeryevna KUNAKH<\/strong><\/p>\n

1971<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

14\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 2 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to a police station at 3 p.m., released at 11.17 p.m.;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\n19792\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Viktor Viktorovich SANZHENAKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1974<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Samara<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSamara Regional Court<\/p>\n

20\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\n19845\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Darya Sergeyevna PLESHAKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1984<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Khabarovsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nKhabarovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\n19851\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Mariya Aleksandrovna SEMENYUK<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Ekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

12\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\n19893\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Yelena Mikhaylovna KUPRIYANOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

20\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.27 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 7 p.m., released in the morning on 10\/09\/2018 as alleged by the applicant;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\n19944\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Viktorovich SEMENYUK<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\n19958\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2018<\/td>\n

Sergey Anatolyevich ZAYTSEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1964<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

25\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 7 p.m., released late in the evening on that day;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\n19999\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Anna Vladimirovna BALDINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

15\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.03 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to a police station at 8.50 p.m., released at 2.45 p.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\n20002\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Nikolayevich VOLKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1984<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\n20029\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Vladimirovich KOCHKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

08\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\n20075\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Valeryevich SVETLOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Belgorod<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\ncommunity work of 40 hours<\/td>\nBelgorod Regional Court<\/p>\n

29\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article\u00a020.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\n20118\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Vadim Borisovich LIVSHITS<\/strong><\/p>\n

1968<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

07\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article\u00a020.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\n20163\/19<\/p>\n

05\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Vyacheslavovich CHIRMAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Murmansk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nMurmansk Regional Court<\/p>\n

19\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article\u00a020.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\n20257\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Vasiliy Mikhaylovich PAVLOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1994<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Belgorod<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\ncommunity work of 40 hours<\/td>\nBelgorod Regional Court<\/p>\n

29\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\n20292\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Natalya Vyacheslavovna NIKIFOROVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1970<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

12\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\n20317\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Mariya Nikolayevna KAYGORODOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1995<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 15,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

29\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.15 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to a police station at midnight on 10\/09\/2018 and released at 8 a.m. that day (according to the Government) or after 5 p.m. (according to the applicant);<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\n20439\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Pavel Borisovich TUDVASEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1964<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Perm<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

community work of 20 hours<\/td>\nPerm Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\n20606\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Yuliya Aleksandrovna ZAYTSEVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1969<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

25\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 3.30 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 5 p.m. and released at 8.20 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018 (according to the Government);<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\n20615\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Kirill Pavlovich FABRITSIYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Volgograd<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nVolgograd Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\n20621\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Albert Eduardovich MKHITARYAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1995<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Tyumen<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 18,000<\/td>\nTyumen Regional Court<\/p>\n

24\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\n20626\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Aleksandrovich KUPRIYANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

detention of 7 days<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

08\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.05 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to police station at 8.50 p.m. and released at 9.50 a.m. on 11\/09\/2018 (according to the Government);<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\n20911\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Olga Viktorovna BALASHOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1970<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2<\/p>\n

\u00a7 6.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested between 5.20 p.m. and 6.10 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 6.50 p.m. and released at 11.30 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018 (according to the Government);<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 6.1 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\n21103\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Vladimirovich ZHELEZKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\n21108\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Anatolyevich PUZATKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

30\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4.15 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. and released at 12.10 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018 (according to the Government);<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\n21177\/19<\/p>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Vladimir Aleksandrovich TRIFANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1959<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

19\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested and brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, released after 12.30 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\n22409\/19<\/p>\n

02\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Stepan Alekseyevich VASILYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1994<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

15\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m., released after 12.30 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\n25483\/19<\/p>\n

30\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Galina Dmitriyevna GLAVURDICH<\/strong><\/p>\n

1967<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Magnitogorsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nChelyabinsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

01\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43.<\/td>\n26475\/19<\/p>\n

08\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Svyatoslav Sergeyevich ALEKSEYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44.<\/td>\n26946\/19<\/p>\n

08\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Alekseyevich SEMENKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Murmansk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 8 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 150,000<\/td>\nMurmansk Regional Court<\/p>\n

06\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 8 of CAO.<\/td>\n5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45.<\/td>\n27967\/19<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Marina-Viktoriya Igorevna ARISTOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Murmansk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nMurmansk Regional Court<\/p>\n

05\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46.<\/td>\n29241\/19<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Danyel Sergeyevich VEBER<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

22\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 2.30 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 3.20 p.m., released after 12 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47.<\/td>\n29268\/19<\/p>\n

06\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Anna Aleksandrovna KULIKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Murmansk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nMurmansk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48.<\/td>\n29929\/19<\/p>\n

24\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Anatolyevich KULAKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1983<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

18\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4.20 p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m., released at 9.49 p.m.;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49.<\/td>\n30043\/19<\/p>\n

25\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Timur Alfredovich VALIULLIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

2001<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Khabarovsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nKhabarovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

26\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50.<\/td>\n33304\/19<\/p>\n

10\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Vadim Yevgenyevich PEKHOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1979<\/td>\n

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Vilnius<\/td>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB 10,000<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Region Court<\/p>\n

16\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty \u2013 arrest and escorting to the police station on 09\/09\/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4\u00a0p.m. on 09\/09\/2018, brought to the police station at 4.20 p.m., released after 1.15 a.m. on 10\/09\/2018;<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO.<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[i]<\/a> Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.<\/p>\n