{"id":21833,"date":"2023-12-07T11:19:46","date_gmt":"2023-12-07T11:19:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=21833"},"modified":"2023-12-07T11:19:46","modified_gmt":"2023-12-07T11:19:46","slug":"case-of-frolova-and-others-v-russia-44292-18-and-41-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=21833","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 44292\/18 and 41 others"},"content":{"rendered":"

The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.<\/p>\n

\n

SECOND SECTION
\nCASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 44292\/18 and 41 others \u2013 see appended list)<\/em>
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n7 December 2023<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Frolova and Others v. Russia,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nLorraine Schembri Orland, President,
\nFr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Krenc,
\nDavor Deren\u010dinovi\u0107, judges,
\nand Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

PROCEDURE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article\u00a034 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

2. The Russian Government (\u201cthe\u00a0Government\u201d) were given notice of the applications.<\/p>\n

THE FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.<\/p>\n

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. JURISDICTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos.\u00a040792\/10 and 2\u00a0others, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a068\u201173, 17\u00a0January 2023).<\/p>\n

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE\u00a011 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article\u00a011 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v.\u00a0Lithuania [GC], no.\u00a037553\/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v.\u00a0Turkey, no.\u00a074552\/01, ECHR 2006\u2011XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v.\u00a0Moldova, no.\u00a033482\/06, 31\u00a0March 2009).<\/p>\n

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.<\/p>\n

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants\u2019 freedom of assembly were not \u201cnecessary in a democratic society\u201d.<\/p>\n

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 \u00a7 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.<\/p>\n

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no.\u00a05865\/07, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a063-65, 13\u00a0February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.\u00a054381\/08 and 5\u00a0others, \u00a7\u00a7 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v.\u00a0Russia, no.\u00a072051\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v.\u00a0Russia, no.\u00a013764\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva, cited above, \u00a7\u00a7 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.<\/p>\n

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention or Protocols thereto. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.<\/p>\n

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case\u2011law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.\u00a025809\/17 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a022, 4\u00a0October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants\u2019 complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;<\/p>\n

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;<\/p>\n

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article\u00a011 of the Convention;<\/p>\n

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);<\/p>\n

6. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and\u00a03 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Viktoriya Maradudina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Lorraine Schembri Orland
\nActing Deputy Registrar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 President<\/p>\n

___________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong>
\nList of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
\n(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of introduction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Applicant\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Year of birth<\/strong><\/td>\n

Representative\u2019s name and location<\/strong><\/td>\nName of the public event<\/strong><\/p>\n

Location<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date<\/strong><\/td>\n

Administrative offence<\/strong><\/td>\nPenalty<\/strong><\/td>\nFinal domestic decision<\/strong><\/p>\n

Court Name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date<\/strong><\/td>\n

Other complaints under well-established case-law<\/strong><\/td>\nAmount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant<\/strong><\/p>\n

(in euros)[1]<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n

1.<\/td>\n44292\/18<\/p>\n

30\/07\/2018<\/td>\n

Tatyana Ivanovna FROLOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1949<\/td>\n

Sivoldayev Ilya Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Voronezh<\/td>\n

Political protest<\/p>\n

Voronezh,<\/p>\n

07\/10\/2017<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a05,000<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Voronezh Regional Court<\/p>\n

30\/01\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n1492\/19<\/p>\n

14\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Marina Aleksandrovna POLYTOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Novocheboksarsk<\/td>\n

Anticorruption rally<\/p>\n

Cheboksary,<\/p>\n

05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 19.3 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO<\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a0600<\/p>\n

30 hours of community work<\/p>\n

30 hours of community work<\/td>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

15\/07\/2018<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2018<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n1504\/19<\/p>\n

14\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Ilya Vyacheslavovich YAKOVLEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/td>\n

Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Novocheboksarsk<\/td>\n

Anticorruption rally<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Cheboksary,<\/p>\n

05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

20 hours of community work<\/p>\n

20 hours of community work<\/td>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2018<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n1609\/19<\/p>\n

19\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Anton Alekseyevich MAMKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Gaynutdinov Damir Ravilevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

Opposition rally<\/p>\n

St Petersburg,<\/p>\n

05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 19.3 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/p>\n

article\u00a020.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

7 days of detention<\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\n

St Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

19\/06\/2018<\/p>\n

St Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

19\/06\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05\/05\/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately, an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings \u2013<\/p>\n

the applicant was convicted under Art.\u00a019.3 and Art. 20.2 of CAO, in separate proceedings, for substantially the same facts relating to his participation in the rally on 05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n15865\/19<\/p>\n

11\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Nataliya Dmitriyevna VOZNESENSKAYA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1966<\/td>\n

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Saint-Barth\u00e9lemy-d\u2019Anjou<\/td>\n

Opposition rally<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

St Petersburg,<\/p>\n

01\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/td>\nSt Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

11\/09\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 01\/05\/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n24461\/19<\/p>\n

16\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Grigoriy Sergeyevich GANDLEVSKIY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

Kiselyov Roman Denisovich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Leafleting to support O.\u00a0Sentsov<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

18\/06\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a020,000<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

16\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18\/06\/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n28537\/19<\/p>\n

12\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Mariya Aleksandrovna MENSHIKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1994<\/td>\n

Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Opposition rally<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

article\u00a019.3 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

fine of RUB 1,000<\/td>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

12\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

28\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05\u201106\/05\/2018 escorting to and detention in a police office for compiling the offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – final decisions – 12\/11\/2018 and 28\/11\/2018, Moscow City Court; Art. 19.3 of CAO and Art. 20.2 of CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant\u2019s prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n29719\/19<\/p>\n

28\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Alisa Yaroslavovna SAFINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Kiselyov Roman Denisovich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Leafleting to support O.\u00a0Sentsov<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

18\/06\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a020,000<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

28\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18\/06\/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n36536\/19<\/p>\n

24\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Anatolyevich KHODAKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Velikiy Novgorod<\/td>\n

Opposition rally<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

05\/05\/2018<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

18\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05\u201107\/05\/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n37287\/19<\/p>\n

24\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Yegor Mikhaylovich AGAFONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally against the isolation of the Russian segments of the Internet<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

10\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

18\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 10\/03\/2019 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n42656\/19<\/p>\n

30\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Mikhaylovich ABRAMOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally against the pension reform<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

06\/10\/2018<\/td>\n

article 19.3 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a01,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a020,000<\/td>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

30\/01\/2019<\/p>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

06\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 06-08\/10\/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – Continued prosecution under Art. 20.2 of CAO after the appeal decision on the charge under Art. 19.3 of CAO, for the substantially same facts<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\n43554\/19<\/p>\n

06\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Yuryevich TARASOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1984<\/td>\n

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Vladivostok<\/td>\n

Rally for free elections<\/p>\n

Vladivostok,<\/p>\n

28\/01\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rally to support A.\u00a0Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Vladivostok,<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\n

Primorye Regional Court<\/p>\n

13\/02\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Primorye Regional Court<\/p>\n

01\/06\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 27\/02\/2018 and 31\/01\/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in two sets administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\n46322\/19<\/p>\n

20\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Yelena Sergeyevna KALININA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1967<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a016,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a016,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

07\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

07\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\n46931\/19<\/p>\n

01\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Mikhail Alekseyevich SHAKLEIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 15\u201116\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\n47104\/19<\/p>\n

01\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikolay Alekseyevich GRIGORYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1983<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

28\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

13\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19\u201121\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07\/04\/2019,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\n47198\/19<\/p>\n

12\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Yekaterina Dmitriyevna TSVETKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

20\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 20\u201121\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station after compiling offence reports on 19\/04\/2019 in relation to the rally on 07\/04\/2019,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\n48382\/19<\/p>\n

05\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Borisovich GANICHEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1978<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a011,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

04\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

04\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 02\u201104\/05\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07\/04\/2019,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\n48398\/19<\/p>\n

05\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Gennadyevich SYUKHIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1981<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 23\u201124\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\n48420\/19<\/p>\n

05\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Grigoriy Sergeyevich BIYALT<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a013,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 14\u201115\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\n48622\/19<\/p>\n

06\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Yuryevich MOLOTOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1981<\/td>\n

Kurochko Yelena Viktorovna<\/p>\n

Vologda<\/td>\n

Anticorruption rally<\/p>\n

Vologda,<\/p>\n

14\/10\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rally to support A. Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Vologda,<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 2 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a020,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

3 days of detention<\/td>\n

Vologda Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/03\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Vologda Regional Court<\/p>\n

11\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\n51013\/19<\/p>\n

19\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniya Mikhaylovna TRUBKINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a011,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\n53329\/19<\/p>\n

18\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Mikhail Igorevich BARNA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a013,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 14\u201115\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\n53970\/19<\/p>\n

01\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Vyacheslav Vasilyevich KABANKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a011,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

20\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19\u201120\/05\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\n54040\/19<\/p>\n

01\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Darya Dmitriyevna PORYADINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a013,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\n55802\/19<\/p>\n

10\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Darya Vasilyevna BOROVIKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a013,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a011,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

04\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19\u201120\/05\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\n55914\/19<\/p>\n

03\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Oksana Anatolyevna VLADYKA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1974<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 11\u201112\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\n56352\/19<\/p>\n

04\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Antonina Viktorovna OBEDNINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1981<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19\u201120\/05\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\n56362\/19<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Arina Aleksandrovna SKLEMINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a011,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\n59321\/19<\/p>\n

31\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich TISHININ<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

04\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

06\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 04\u201106\/05\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\n59324\/19<\/p>\n

31\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Yuriy Yevgenyevich CHESNOKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1966<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 3 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a016,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

90 hours of community work<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\n59548\/19<\/p>\n

01\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Oleg Vladimirovich BOROVIKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1994<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a012,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\n61179\/19<\/p>\n

31\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Arseniy Vyacheslavovich KOSTENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a013,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18\u201119\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07\/04\/2019,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\n61735\/19<\/p>\n

12\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Oleg Vladimirovich LARIONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1952<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a014,000<\/td>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 08\u201109\/04\/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07\/04\/2019,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\n62431\/19<\/p>\n

20\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Yegor Olegovich MATOFANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Kazan<\/td>\n

A \u201chybrid\u201d rally against construction of waste incineration plant<\/p>\n

Arkhangelsk,<\/p>\n

07\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/p>\n

and<\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a015,000<\/td>\nArkhangelsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

01\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\n16029\/21<\/p>\n

05\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Svetlana Borisovna DILMAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1975<\/td>\n

Memorial Human Rights Centre<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally to support S.\u00a0Furgal<\/p>\n

Komsomolsk-on-Amur,<\/p>\n

29\/07\/2020<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n20 hours of community work<\/td>\nKhabarovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

25\/11\/2020<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n3,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\n16043\/21<\/p>\n

05\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Mikhail Aleksandrovich BARANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

Memorial Human Rights Centre<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally against constitutional amendments<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

15\/07\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rally to support A.\u00a0Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 8 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a0150,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

12 days of detention<\/td>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

13\/10\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

08\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 15\u201116\/07\/2020 and 31\/01\/2021-01\/02\/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect<\/td>\n

6,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\n16305\/21<\/p>\n

04\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Roman Dmitriyevich PICHUZHIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

Memorial Human Rights Centre<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

03\/08\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rally to support A.\u00a0Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 8 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a020,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

30 days of detention<\/td>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

04\/09\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Moscow City Court<\/p>\n

09\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 03\u201104\/08\/2019 and 31\/01\/2021-01\/02\/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\n19041\/21<\/p>\n

26\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Yelena Aleksandrovna GORSKAYA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Pryanishnikov Aleksey Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Tomsk<\/td>\n

Rally to support A.\u00a0Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

02\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n10 days of detention<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

08\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 03\/02\/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\n19090\/21<\/p>\n

26\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Tatyana Vladimirovna SHADRINA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Rally to support I.\u00a0Azar<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

28\/05\/2020<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\nfine of RUB\u00a018,000<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

16\/10\/2020<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 28\/05\/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings<\/td>\n

4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\n20656\/21<\/p>\n

25\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Feliksovich VETROV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/td>\n

Memorial Human Rights Centre<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Rally to support A.\u00a0Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Moscow,<\/p>\n

02\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7\u00a06.1 of CAO<\/td>\n12 days of detention<\/td>\nMoscow City Court<\/p>\n

09\/02\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,<\/p>\n

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect<\/td>\n

5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\n20779\/21<\/p>\n

22\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Andrey Vladimirovich SUSLONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Vladivostok<\/td>\n

Rally to support S.\u00a0Furgal<\/p>\n

Vladivostok,<\/p>\n

01\/08\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rally to support S.\u00a0Furgal<\/p>\n

Vladivostok,<\/p>\n

08\/08\/2020<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n

fine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

fine of RUB\u00a010,000<\/td>\n

Primorye Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/11\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Primorye Regional Court<\/p>\n

16\/11\/2020<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 22\/08\/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports in relation to the rallies on 01\/08\/2020 and 08\/08\/2020<\/td>\n4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\n21241\/21<\/p>\n

06\/04\/2021<\/td>\n

Ivan Vladimirovich IGITOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1979<\/td>\n

Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Rally to support A. Navalnyy<\/p>\n

Yekaterinburg,<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2021<\/td>\n

article 20.2 \u00a7 5 of CAO<\/td>\n30 hours of community work<\/td>\nSverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

18\/03\/2021<\/td>\n

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 31\/01\/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report<\/td>\n4,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[1]<\/a> Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. SECOND SECTION CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 44292\/18 and 41 others \u2013 see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 December…<\/p>\n

Read more →<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-available-in-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21833"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21834,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21833\/revisions\/21834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}