{"id":22096,"date":"2024-01-18T11:25:20","date_gmt":"2024-01-18T11:25:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22096"},"modified":"2024-01-18T11:25:20","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T11:25:20","slug":"case-of-salkov-and-others-v-ukraine-13087-17-and-10-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22096","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF SALKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 13087\/17 and 10 others"},"content":{"rendered":"

European Court of Human Rights
\nFIFTH SECTION
\nCASE OF SALKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 13087\/17 and 10 others \u2013 see appended list)
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n18 January 2024<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Salkov and Others v. Ukraine,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nM\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits, President,
\nKate\u0159ina \u0160im\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1,
\nMykola Gnatovskyy, judges,
\nand Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

PROCEDURE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article\u00a034 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

2. The Ukrainian Government (\u201cthe\u00a0Government\u201d) were given notice of the applications.<\/p>\n

THE FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE\u00a06 \u00a7 1 AND\u00a0ARTICLE\u00a013 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. The applicants complained that the length of the civil proceedings in their cases had been incompatible with the \u201creasonable time\u201d requirement and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Article\u00a06 \u00a7 1 and Article\u00a013 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

6. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no.\u00a030979\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000-VII).<\/p>\n

7. In the leading case of Karnaushenko v. Ukraine (no.\u00a023853\/02, 30\u00a0November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.<\/p>\n

8. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the \u201creasonable time\u201d requirement.<\/p>\n

9. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.<\/p>\n

10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article\u00a06 \u00a7 1 and of Article\u00a013 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

III. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE\u00a041 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

11. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case\u2011law (see, in particular, Karnaushenko, cited above, \u00a7\u00a7 70 and 75), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Declares the applications admissible;<\/p>\n

3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 6 \u00a7 1 and Article\u00a013 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law;<\/p>\n

4. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and\u00a03 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Viktoriya Maradudina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits
\nActing Deputy Registrar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 President<\/p>\n

____________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong>
\nList of applications raising complaints under Article 6 \u00a7 1 and Article 13 of the Convention
\n(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of introduction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Applicant\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Year of birth<\/strong><\/td>\n

Representative\u2019s name and location<\/strong><\/td>\nStart of proceedings<\/strong><\/td>\nEnd of proceedings<\/strong><\/td>\nTotal length<\/strong><\/p>\n

Levels of jurisdiction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant\/ household<\/strong><\/p>\n

(in euros)[i]<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n

1.<\/td>\n13087\/17<\/p>\n

08\/02\/2017<\/td>\n

Volodymyr Viktorovych SALKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1956<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

19\/12\/2014<\/td>\n23\/06\/2021<\/td>\n6 years and<\/p>\n

6 months and 5 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n18378\/17<\/p>\n

22\/02\/2017<\/td>\n

Oleg Valeriyovych IVANISHCHEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych<\/p>\n

Chernigiv<\/td>\n

21\/11\/2014<\/td>\n29\/09\/2021<\/td>\n6 years and<\/p>\n

10 months and 9 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n20605\/17<\/p>\n

06\/03\/2017<\/td>\n

Valentyn Vasylyovych TVERDOKHLIB<\/strong><\/p>\n

1963<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

26\/11\/2014<\/td>\n29\/06\/2021<\/td>\n6 years and<\/p>\n

7 months and 4 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n1532\/18<\/p>\n

29\/12\/2017<\/td>\n

Igor Anatoliyovych PRYSHKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1979<\/td>\n

Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych<\/p>\n

Chernigiv<\/td>\n

11\/11\/2014<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

pending<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

More than<\/p>\n

9 years and 4 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

1,800<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n19904\/18<\/p>\n

17\/04\/2018<\/td>\n

Oleksandr Anatoliyovych GARDETSKYY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1978<\/td>\n

Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych<\/p>\n

Chernigiv<\/td>\n

07\/04\/2015<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

30\/09\/2021<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

6 years and<\/p>\n

5 months and 24 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

600<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n57092\/18<\/p>\n

23\/11\/2018<\/td>\n

Igor Volodymyrovych ROGATYUK<\/strong><\/p>\n

1976<\/td>\n

Avramenko Gennadiy Mykolayovych<\/p>\n

Chernigiv<\/td>\n

03\/11\/2014<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

15\/12\/2021<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

7 years and<\/p>\n

1 month and 13 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n38183\/18<\/p>\n

27\/07\/2018<\/td>\n

Oleksandr Pavlovych PROSKURIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1958<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

19\/01\/2015<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

pending<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

More than 8 years<\/p>\n

and 10 months and 5 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

2,300<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n2370\/19<\/p>\n

11\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

Household<\/u><\/p>\n

Olga Petrivna KOTOVSKA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/p>\n

Mariya Dmytrivna KOTOVSKA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1959<\/td>\n

Mukan Ivan Vasylyovych<\/p>\n

Staryy Sambir<\/td>\n

15\/12\/2006<\/td>\npending<\/td>\nMore than 16 years<\/p>\n

and 11 months and 2 days<\/p>\n

1 level of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

8,400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n12788\/19<\/p>\n

27\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Anatoliy Grygorovych LOZA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1946<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

08\/06\/2010<\/p>\n

16\/11\/2011<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2016<\/td>\n

24\/05\/2011<\/p>\n

19\/05\/2016<\/p>\n

27\/06\/2018 (decision of 27\/06\/2018 received by the applicant on 27\/08\/2018)<\/td>\n

7 years and 4 months<\/p>\n

and 23 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

900<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n38492\/21<\/p>\n

22\/07\/2021<\/td>\n

Oleg Yuriyovych ANDRUSHCHENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Sobyna Pavlo Mykolayovych<\/p>\n

Okhtyrka<\/td>\n

28\/03\/2019<\/td>\npending<\/td>\nMore than 4 years and<\/p>\n

7 months and 18 days<\/p>\n

1 level of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

1,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n3741\/23<\/p>\n

30\/12\/2022<\/td>\n

Galyna Mykhaylivna SHEPELEVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

Trushkivska Lesya Viktorivna<\/p>\n

Kyiv<\/td>\n

25\/03\/2014<\/td>\n31\/08\/2022<\/td>\n8 years and 5 months<\/p>\n

and 7 days<\/p>\n

3 levels of jurisdiction<\/td>\n

1,200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[i]<\/a> Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.<\/p>\n