{"id":22189,"date":"2024-02-01T10:10:01","date_gmt":"2024-02-01T10:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22189"},"modified":"2024-02-01T10:10:01","modified_gmt":"2024-02-01T10:10:01","slug":"case-of-dzundza-and-others-v-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22189","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA"},"content":{"rendered":"

The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.<\/p>\n

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants\u2019 confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

\n

European Court of Human Rights
\nSECOND SECTION
\nCASE OF DZUNDZA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 26285\/19 and 46 others \u2013 see appended list)
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n1 February 2024<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Dzundza and Others v. Russia,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nLorraine Schembri Orland, President,
\nFr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Krenc,
\nDavor Deren\u010dinovi\u0107, judges,
\nand Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

PROCEDURE<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article\u00a034 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

2. The Russian Government (\u201cthe\u00a0Government\u201d) were given notice of the applications.<\/p>\n

THE FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.<\/p>\n

4. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792\/10 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a068\u201173, 17 January 2023).<\/p>\n

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs\u00a03 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION on account of confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cNo one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Some applicants also complained that they had not had an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievance under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cEveryone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.\u201d<\/p>\n

8. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655\/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article\u00a03 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants\u2019 confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.<\/p>\n

10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

11. In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants\u2019 complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597\/13, \u00a7 27, 26 March 2019).<\/p>\n

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill\u2011founded within the meaning of Article\u00a035\u00a0\u00a7\u00a03\u00a0(a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993\/08, 28\u00a0November 2013, concerning inadequate conditions of post-conviction detention and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v.\u00a0Russia, nos. 18255\/10 and 5 others, \u00a7\u00a7 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Gorlov and Others v.\u00a0Russia, nos. 27057\/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees).<\/p>\n

V. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE\u00a041 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case\u2011law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16\u00a0September 2022;<\/p>\n

3. Declares the applications admissible;<\/p>\n

4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article\u00a03 of the Convention on account of the applicants\u2019 placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;<\/p>\n

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);<\/p>\n

6. Holds that it is not necessary to deal separately with the applicants\u2019 complaints under Article 13 of the Convention related to the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in courtrooms;<\/p>\n

7. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and\u00a03 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Viktoriya Maradudina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Lorraine Schembri Orland
\nActing Deputy Registrar \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0President<\/p>\n

___________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong><\/p>\n

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
\n(use of metal cages and\/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of introduction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Applicant\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Year of birth<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Representative\u2019s name and location<\/strong><\/td>\nName of the court<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of the relevant judgment<\/strong><\/td>\n

Start date<\/strong><\/td>\nEnd date<\/strong><\/td>\nOther complaints under well-established case-law<\/strong><\/td>\nAmount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[i]<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1.<\/td>\n26285\/19<\/p>\n

06\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Alekseyevich DZUNDZA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

27\/10\/2018<\/td>\n08\/11\/2018<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n26496\/19<\/p>\n

13\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Koba Shalvovich SHURGAYA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

Krikun Leonid Leonidovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Segezha Town Court of the Karelia Republic<\/p>\n

In a courtroom<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Karelia Republic<\/p>\n

Video link<\/p>\n

13\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Segezha Town Court of the Karelia Republic<\/p>\n

Video link from IK-7, the Karelia Republic<\/p>\n

19\/08\/2020<\/td>\n

30\/01\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

19\/08\/2020<\/td>\n

13\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

19\/08\/2020<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n26648\/19<\/p>\n

06\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Anatolyevich RYDANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Voroshilovskiy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court<\/p>\n

10\/04\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

15\/06\/2018<\/td>\n10\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n26688\/19<\/p>\n

06\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Vasilyevich PUPENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Prokofyeva Viktoriya Pavlovna<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Nevskiy District Court of St\u00a0Petersburg<\/p>\n

26\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

08\/11\/2018<\/td>\n26\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by van on a number of occasions from the detention facility to the courthouse; inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, overcrowding; from 08\/11\/2018 to 26\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n28605\/19<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Sergeyevich NESMACHNYKH<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ingodinskiy District Court of Chita<\/p>\n

24\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

17\/09\/2018<\/td>\n24\/12\/2018<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n28993\/19<\/p>\n

27\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Andreyevich POPOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Gatchina Town Court of the Leningrad Region<\/p>\n

05\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

10\/05\/2018<\/td>\n05\/04\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport on numerous occasions from the detention facility to the courthouse from 10\/05\/2018 to 05\/04\/2019: less than 3 sq. m of personal space, transfers lasted from 1.5 to 5 hours; no hot meals on the days of the hearings<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n29154\/19<\/p>\n

20\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Yuryevich BELYAKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1964<\/td>\n

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

St Petersburg City Court<\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO-6,<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/p>\n

28\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

26\/11\/2018<\/td>\n28\/11\/2018<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n29410\/19<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Artem Anatolyevich LOSEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St\u00a0Petersburg; Vyborg Town Court of Leningrad Region, Leningrad Regional Court.<\/p>\n

In person at courts and via video link from<\/p>\n

SIZO-3, Leningrad Region<\/p>\n

11\/01\/2018<\/td>\n

16\/01\/2016<\/td>\n21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n30273\/19<\/p>\n

27\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BARTENEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Sysolskiy District Court of the Komi Republic<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

03\/04\/2019<\/td>\n07\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n30353\/19<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Maksim Dzhabrailovich NURMAGOMEDOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Pavlov Anton Sergeyevich<\/p>\n

Saint Petersburg<\/td>\n

On numerous occasions starting from 30\/04\/2017 before the courts of St\u00a0Petersburg<\/p>\n

26\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

30\/04\/2017<\/td>\n26\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n30658\/19<\/p>\n

27\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Ruslan Vladimirovich VORONTSOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Leninskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

02\/12\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

02\/12\/2020<\/td>\n

21\/08\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

25\/02\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

13\/07\/2020<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

21\/09\/2020<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

24\/08\/2020<\/td>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – numerous occasions of transport from the detention facility in Sosnovoborsk to the courthouse, starting from 21\/08\/2018 and on-going; several hours of transport by van; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\n31524\/19<\/p>\n

30\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Mikhaylovich MAMROV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Milkovskiy District Court of Kamchatka Region<\/p>\n

from 05\/02\/2019 to 18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

05\/02\/2019<\/td>\n18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\n31894\/19<\/p>\n

03\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Anatolyevich ZEMTSOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1974<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Kanavinskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court (by way of videoconference from the detention facility)<\/p>\n

28\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

04\/05\/2018<\/td>\n28\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of poor conditions of detention and inadequate conditions of transport,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – inadequate conditions of transport by prison van on numerous occasions between the detention facility and the courthouse in the period from 04\/05\/2018 to 04\/02\/2019; 0.3 sq. m of personal space; lack of fresh air; restricted access to toilet;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention after conviction – IK-11 Nizhniy Novgorod Region, detention from 22\/04\/2019, pending as of 16\/09\/2022; less than 2 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – SIZO-1 Nizhniy Novgorod 19\/02\/2019-23\/02\/2019 in cell 15\/171, opposite-sex operators<\/td>\n

11,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\n33728\/19<\/p>\n

19\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Maksim Aleksandrovich MORALEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Semyanovskiy Dmitriy Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Astrakhan<\/td>\n

Trusovskiy District Court of Astrakhan, Astrakhan Regional Court<\/p>\n

14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

30\/08\/2018<\/td>\n14\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\n34112\/19<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Anton Ivanovich SOFRONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Pryazhinskiy District Court of the Kareliya Republic<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

18\/11\/2018<\/td>\nPending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\n34944\/19<\/p>\n

09\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Viktorovich ZHEREBTSOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Syktyvkar Town Court<\/p>\n

11\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

Beginning date unknown<\/td>\n11\/02\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic in respect of poor conditions of detention;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention after conviction – detention in IK-19 Komi Republic, from 04\/01\/2019, pending as of 16\/09\/2022; 2.4 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen<\/td>\n

16,300<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\n35714\/19<\/p>\n

27\/01\/2020<\/td>\n

Arkadiy Vladimirovich LESHCHEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Nefteyuganskiy District Court of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region<\/p>\n

09\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

21\/08\/2018<\/td>\n09\/08\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\n35723\/19<\/p>\n

24\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Anton Yuryevich CHAKHLOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

18\/01\/2019<\/td>\n22\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\n36528\/19<\/p>\n

28\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Vladimirovich KOROLEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Pavlov Posad Town Court of the Moscow Region (metal cages during trial court hearings in person)<\/p>\n

Moscow Regional Court (from SIZO -2, Yaroslavl Region)<\/p>\n

05\/03\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

20\/04\/2018<\/td>\n05\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\n36939\/19<\/p>\n

25\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Omar Guramovich USOYAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Fedorkov Andrey Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Moscow District Court of St\u00a0Petersburg<\/p>\n

25\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

22\/09\/2015<\/td>\n25\/12\/2018<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transfers between courthouses and remand prisons in St\u00a0Petersburg from 22\/09\/2015 to 18\/04\/2019; 0.25 sq. m; overcrowding, lack of fresh air<\/td>\n8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\n38505\/19<\/p>\n

14\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Olga Viktorovna GORBACHEVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Kostetskiy Denis Gennadiyevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Tambov;<\/p>\n

Tambov Regional Court;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO-1, Tambov Region<\/p>\n

29\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

18\/09\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

18\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

11\/02\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

29\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\n38820\/19<\/p>\n

08\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Akhmed Magomedrasulovich MAGOMEDOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Krasnoyarsk Region Court<\/p>\n

10\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

10\/01\/2019<\/td>\n10\/01\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\n41684\/19<\/p>\n

13\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Vladislavovich SINEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Elektrostal Town Court of Moscow Region (hearings in person);<\/p>\n

Moscow Regional Court (video link during an appeal hearing from SIZO-1, Ivanovo Region)<\/p>\n

19\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

30\/06\/2017<\/td>\n19\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\n43156\/19<\/p>\n

31\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Mikhail Mikhaylovich TERENTYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

Loskutov Vyacheslav Alekseyevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

North-Caucasus Circuit Military Court<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

22\/11\/2018<\/td>\n31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\n44803\/19<\/p>\n

05\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Igor Nikolayevich SIGIDA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1963<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Novocherkassk Town Court of the Rostov Region, Rostov Regional Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

02\/11\/2018<\/td>\n13\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\n44876\/19<\/p>\n

30\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Viktorovich KONNOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Slavyansk-on-Kuban Town Court of the Krasnodar Region<\/p>\n

29\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

28\/03\/2017<\/td>\n29\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport on 03-05\/05\/2019 and 08-09\/05\/2019 by train; lack of an individual sleeping place; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet; poor sanitary conditions; restricted access to potable water and food; conditions of transport by van on multiple occasions between 04\/04\/2017 and 29\/03\/2019, SIZO-3 Novorossiysk – Slavyansk Town Court – SIZO-1 Krasnodar – IVS Slavyansk-on-Kuban; lack of a place to seat, overcrowding;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\n45367\/19<\/p>\n

02\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikita Igorevich CHERNOMORETS<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan<\/p>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan<\/p>\n

29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – from 04\/04\/2018 to 05\/10\/2021 from SIZO-1 Republic of Tatarstan to the Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan in vans (59\u00a0transfers; return trip: 5 to 6 hours) and detention in holding cells: overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no food provided on the dates of the court hearings;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\n45955\/19<\/p>\n

25\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Andreyevich ZAMOTAYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

29\/01\/2019<\/td>\n07\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\n46996\/19<\/p>\n

25\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Maksim Nikolayevich ZAGORULYA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1981<\/td>\n

Gerasimov Valeriy Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Minkino<\/td>\n

Cherepovets Town Court, Vologda Regional Court;<\/p>\n

Video link from an unidentified facility<\/p>\n

27\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

12\/08\/2017<\/td>\n27\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\n47605\/19<\/p>\n

27\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikolay Sergeyevich POKHORUKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Istra Town Court of the Moscow Region;<\/p>\n

Moscow Regional Court<\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO-1, Ivanovo Region<\/p>\n

04\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/08\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

04\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\n47622\/19<\/p>\n

04\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Vladimirovich SILANTYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n30\/08\/2018<\/td>\n06\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\n47913\/19<\/p>\n

05\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Dun CHEN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1985<\/td>\n

Murashkin Igor Gennadyevich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Saint-Petersburg City Court; Video link from SIZO-1 in St Petersburg and Leningrad Region<\/p>\n

08\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

08\/04\/2019<\/td>\n08\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\n48265\/19<\/p>\n

26\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich ANIKIYENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Pushkinskiy Town Court of St\u00a0Petersburg and St Petersburg City Court,<\/p>\n

on numerous occasions during court hearings<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

20\/01\/2017<\/td>\n21\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by van on numerous occasions from the detention facility to the court houses to take part in the hearings from 20\/01\/2017 to 21\/03\/2019; overcrowding; 2-4 hours of transport; restricted access to toilet; no lighting; and poor conditions of transport between SIZO-1 of St\u00a0Petersburg and IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region during 20\/04\/2019-21\/06\/2019;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of poor conditions of transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\n48294\/19<\/p>\n

02\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Gennadyevich KEYS<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Yezhov Yevgeniy Sergeyevich<\/p>\n

Velikiy Novgorod<\/td>\n

Novgorodskiy District Court of Novgorod Region, numerous occasions<\/p>\n

13\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

16\/12\/2018<\/td>\n13\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\n48920\/19<\/p>\n

09\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Rafail Failovich GALIKEYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/td>\n

Stasyuk Olga Andreyevna<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Petrozavodsk Town Court of the Karelia Republic, Supreme Court of Karelia (videoconference)<\/p>\n

13\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

26\/10\/2017<\/td>\n13\/02\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by van and train on 26\/03\/2019; overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\n49568\/19<\/p>\n

07\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Ryskeldi Abdygaparovich ABDYGAPAROV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

Kondratyuk Yegor Ivanovich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Kuzminskiy District Court of Moscow<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

25\/02\/2019<\/td>\n14\/08\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\n49980\/19<\/p>\n

09\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Magomedsalakh Balavdiyevich ALBEKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1962<\/td>\n

Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich<\/p>\n

Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

30\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

15\/03\/2018<\/td>\n30\/09\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\n50383\/19<\/p>\n

07\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikita Sergeyevich NIKONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

Urlashov Aleksey Mikhaylovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Nevskiy District Court of St\u00a0Petersburg<\/p>\n

15\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

01\/11\/2018<\/td>\n15\/04\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – numerous occasions of transport from the detention facility to the courthouse; between 18\/11\/2015 and 05\/06\/2019; 0.3\u00a0sq.\u00a0m, lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of hot meal during the day, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to toilet<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\n50544\/19<\/p>\n

13\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Marat Aukhatovich TULYAKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1979<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court<\/p>\n

13\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

03\/10\/2018<\/td>\n13\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by a van to the courthouse on numerous occasions in the period between 03\/10\/2018 to 13\/03\/2019; lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, overcrowding, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or inadequate furniture;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\n53801\/19<\/p>\n

18\/01\/2020<\/td>\n

Tikhon Aleksandrovich KOSTIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

Dvizov Aleksey Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

Nyagan<\/td>\n

Altai Regional Court<\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO, Biysk Altai Region<\/p>\n

01\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

01\/08\/2019<\/td>\n01\/08\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\n54101\/19<\/p>\n

04\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Anton Sergeyevich STETSENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1979<\/td>\n

Markin Maksim Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Detention in a metal cage during the trial hearings at the Sergiyev Posad Town Court<\/p>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

01\/03\/2019<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport between the remand prison and the domestic courts on several occasions from 01\/03\/2019 to 17\/04\/2019 (overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water). Transport by train from 15\/06\/2019 to 16\/06\/2019 (overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet)<\/td>\n8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\n54289\/19<\/p>\n

09\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Aydan Aleksandrovich BAZYR-SADY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Pleshkov Maksim Alekseyevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Ulug-Khemskiy District Court of the Republic of Tyva<\/p>\n

09\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

09\/04\/2019<\/td>\n09\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43.<\/td>\n54593\/19<\/p>\n

09\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Vitalyevich KATAYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1978<\/td>\n

Pleshkov Maksim Alekseyevich<\/p>\n

Moscow<\/td>\n

Kyzyl Town Court; Supreme Court of the Republic of Tyva<\/p>\n

03\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

18\/01\/2018<\/td>\n03\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44.<\/td>\n58119\/19<\/p>\n

16\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Arsen Anatolyevich YERIZHOKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

Khorikov Andrey Vladimirovich<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Primorskiy District Court of St\u00a0Petersburg and the Petrogradskiy District Court of St Petersburg, detention and trial hearings,<\/p>\n

and the appellate hearings concerning the applicant\u2019s detention held at the St Petersburg City Court through videoconference<\/p>\n

14\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

10\/09\/2018<\/td>\n14\/10\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – van on multiple occasions from 24\/08\/2018 to 14\/10\/2019 (overcrowding, 0.3-0.4 sq.m. per inmate, lack of fresh air, lack of heating, lack of safety belts, handcuffing during transport)<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45.<\/td>\n58293\/19<\/p>\n

25\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Valeriy Valeryevich MOROZOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1977<\/td>\n

Avanesyan Aleksey Viktorovich<\/p>\n

Yekaterinburg<\/td>\n

Pervomayskiy District Court of the Krasnodar Region, Oktyabrskiy District Court of the Krasnodar Region, Krasnodar Regional Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

06\/04\/2019<\/td>\n21\/10\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 5 (3) – excessive length of pre-trial detention – from 04\/04\/2019 to 19\/06\/2020, 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 16\u00a0day(s);<\/p>\n

specific defects: use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice;<\/p>\n

failure to assess the applicant\u2019s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding;<\/p>\n

failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint;<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46.<\/td>\n59391\/19<\/p>\n

06\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Konstantin Gennadyevich ANTONKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1969<\/td>\n

Voronkina Anna Aleksandrovna<\/p>\n

Kemerovo<\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Kemerovo<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

01\/08\/2018<\/td>\nProceedings pending on the date when the application was lodged with the Court<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47.<\/td>\n60716\/19<\/p>\n

15\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Artem Aleksandrovich CHURINOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1983<\/td>\n

Semyanovskiy Dmitriy Aleksandrovich<\/p>\n

Astrakhan<\/td>\n

Astrakhan Regional Court (by way of videoconference from SIZO-1 Astrakhan Region)<\/p>\n

11\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

11\/07\/2019<\/td>\n11\/07\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[i]<\/a> Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.<\/p>\n