{"id":22191,"date":"2024-02-01T10:16:03","date_gmt":"2024-02-01T10:16:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22191"},"modified":"2024-02-01T10:16:03","modified_gmt":"2024-02-01T10:16:03","slug":"case-of-mikhaylov-and-others-v-russia-27315-19-and-50-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=22191","title":{"rendered":"CASE OF MIKHAYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 27315\/19 and 50 others"},"content":{"rendered":"

The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants\u2019 confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

\n

European Court of Human Rights
\nSECOND SECTION
\nCASE OF MIKHAYLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA<\/strong>
\n(Applications nos. 27315\/19 and 50 others \u2013 see appended list)
\nJUDGMENT
\nSTRASBOURG
\n1 February 2024<\/p>\n

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.<\/p>\n

In the case of Mikhaylov and Others v. Russia,<\/strong><\/p>\n

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
\nLorraine Schembri Orland, President,
\nFr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Krenc,
\nDavor Deren\u010dinovi\u0107, judges,
\nand Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024,<\/p>\n

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:<\/p>\n

PROCEDURE<\/p>\n

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article\u00a034 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (\u201cthe Convention\u201d) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

2. The Russian Government (\u201cthe\u00a0Government\u201d) were given notice of the applications.<\/p>\n

THE FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.<\/p>\n

4. The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.<\/p>\n

II. Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792\/10 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7\u00a068\u201173, 17 January 2023).<\/p>\n

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs\u00a03 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION on account of confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cNo one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Some applicants also complained that they had not had an effective domestic remedy in respect of their grievance under Article 3, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n

\u201cEveryone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.\u201d<\/p>\n

8. The Court notes that the applicants were kept a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, nos. 59655\/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article\u00a03 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants\u2019 confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.<\/p>\n

10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.<\/p>\n

11. In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants\u2019 complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597\/13, \u00a7 27, 26 March 2019).<\/p>\n

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW<\/strong><\/p>\n

122. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill\u2011founded within the meaning of Article\u00a035\u00a0\u00a7\u00a03\u00a0(a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993\/08, 28\u00a0November 2013, concerning inadequate conditions of post-conviction detention; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 103-08, 22 May 2012, and Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255\/10 and 5 others, \u00a7\u00a7 92-156, 9 April 2019, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect).<\/p>\n

V. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE\u00a041 OF THE CONVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case\u2011law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.<\/p>\n

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Decides to join the applications;<\/p>\n

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16\u00a0September 2022;<\/p>\n

3. Declares the applications admissible;<\/p>\n

4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article\u00a03 of the Convention on account of the applicants\u2019 placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;<\/p>\n

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);<\/p>\n

6. Holds that it is not necessary to deal separately with the applicants\u2019 complaints under Article 13 of the Convention related to the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about placement in a metal cage in courtrooms;<\/p>\n

7. Holds<\/p>\n

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;<\/p>\n

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.<\/p>\n

Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule\u00a077\u00a0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a02 and\u00a03 of the Rules of Court.<\/p>\n

Viktoriya Maradudina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Lorraine Schembri Orland
\nActing Deputy Registrar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 President<\/p>\n

_______________<\/p>\n

APPENDIX<\/strong>
\nList of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
\n(use of metal cages and\/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
No.<\/strong><\/td>\nApplication no.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of introduction<\/strong><\/td>\n

Applicant\u2019s name<\/strong><\/p>\n

Year of birth<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Representative\u2019s name and location<\/strong><\/td>\nName of the court<\/strong><\/p>\n

Date of the relevant judgment<\/strong><\/td>\n

Start date<\/strong><\/td>\nEnd date<\/strong><\/td>\nOther complaints under well-established case-law<\/strong><\/td>\nAmount awarded for pecuniary and non\u2011pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[i]<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1.<\/td>\n27315\/19<\/p>\n

20\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Vladimir Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1976<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ingodinskiy District Court of Chita<\/p>\n

08\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

07\/10\/2018<\/td>\n08\/02\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – single-prisoner cubicles in police vans between 07\/10\/2018 and 08\/02\/2019, 0.6 sq. m per person, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking<\/td>\n8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\n28465\/19<\/p>\n

06\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikita Vitalyevich TURKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Abakan Town Court of the Khakassia Republic<\/p>\n

12\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

04\/06\/2019<\/td>\n12\/07\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transit cell, from 04\/06\/2019 to 12\/07\/2019, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet;<\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\n29171\/19<\/p>\n

18\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Eldar Igorevich PENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1991<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Odintsovo Town Court<\/p>\n

28\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Moscow Regional Court<\/p>\n

22\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

18\/12\/2017<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

22\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

28\/11\/2018<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

22\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\n29442\/19<\/p>\n

16\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Roman Yevgenyevich DORMIDONTOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Kanavinskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod<\/p>\n

25\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

06\/03\/2019<\/td>\n25\/03\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – van, transit cell, on a number of occasions from 10\/08\/2018 to 25\/03\/2019, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient natural light, uncomfortable position during transfers in view of a small size of transport “glass”\/ bio-toilet, no or restricted access to toilet<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\n29578\/19<\/p>\n

24\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Aleksandrovich MARTUS<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

04\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

12\/12\/2018<\/td>\n04\/04\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – van, multiple roundtrips from SIZO-1 Krasnoyarsk to the Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, between11\/12\/2018 and 29\/10\/2019, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\n30234\/19<\/p>\n

13\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Vitaliy Gennadyevich USKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Volgograd Regional Court<\/p>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/td>\n17\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\n30333\/19<\/p>\n

23\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Aleksandrovich KUPAVTSEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Barnaul Rubtsovsk Town Court<\/p>\n

11\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

26\/10\/2017<\/td>\n11\/01\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by van from the detention facility to take part in investigative actions or to attend court hearings; numerous occasions of transport, overcrowding, inadequate temperature; from 26\/10\/2017 to 11\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\n31290\/19<\/p>\n

27\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Roman Petrovich PAVLENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Vizinga District Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

19\/02\/2019<\/td>\n22\/02\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – numerous occasions of transport from SIZO-1 Syktyvkar to Vizinga District Court, van; from 15\/06\/2018 to 22\/02\/2019; single-occupancy cubicle, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet<\/td>\n8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\n32738\/19<\/p>\n

04\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SRIBNYY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

Koneva Nina Filippovna<\/p>\n

Khanty-Mansiysk<\/td>\n

Nizhnevartovsk Town Court of Khanty-Mansy Autonomous Region – Yugra<\/p>\n

21\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

29\/07\/2018<\/td>\n21\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\n32743\/19<\/p>\n

03\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

German Romayevich SHOKUYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1993<\/td>\n

Egle Denis Sergeyevich<\/p>\n

Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n

Zheleznodorozhnyy District Court of Chita; Zabaykalskiy Regional Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

22\/07\/2015<\/td>\n31\/01\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – transport by van on a number of occasions between the detention facility and the courthouse from 22\/07\/2015 to 31\/01\/2019; 0.25 sq.\u00a0m of personal space; restricted access to toilet<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\n32848\/19<\/p>\n

31\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

Ivan Vladimirovich MAKARENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Surgut Town Court<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

24\/10\/2018<\/td>\n31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\n33397\/19<\/p>\n

08\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Nikolayevich KOZIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1983<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Kolomna Town Court of the Moscow Region<\/p>\n

11\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

07\/08\/2017<\/td>\n11\/12\/2018<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\n33786\/19<\/p>\n

06\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Andreyevich KANEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1993<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar of the Komi Republic<\/p>\n

10\/12\/2018<\/td>\n

19\/07\/2018<\/td>\n10\/12\/2018<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\n34252\/19<\/p>\n

17\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Mikhail Yevgenyevich NIKONOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1976<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Moskovskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court<\/p>\n

20\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

16\/10\/2018<\/td>\n20\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\n36560\/19<\/p>\n

08\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Anatolyevich VERESOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1982<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Petrozavodsk Town Court<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Segezha Town Court of the Karelia Republic<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

17\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

26\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/06\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

02\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – train, on a number of occasions between 13\/05\/2019 and 12\/06\/2019; overcrowding; passive smoking, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\n36617\/19<\/p>\n

27\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Vladimirovich KONOVALOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1995<\/td>\n

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Novouralsk Town Court of Sverdlovsk Region, Sverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

22\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

18\/12\/2018<\/td>\n22\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\n38517\/19<\/p>\n

08\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Andrey Andreyevich TYUKAVKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1984<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Priargunsk District Court of the Zabaykalskiy Region<\/p>\n

14\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n14\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\n39298\/19<\/p>\n

08\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Alina Sergeyevna KONDRASHOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar<\/p>\n

29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

09\/02\/2018<\/td>\n29\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\n39530\/19<\/p>\n

20\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

Pavel Andreyevich BAKSHEYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

29\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

27\/12\/2018<\/td>\n29\/08\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\n40349\/19<\/p>\n

14\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Nikita Valeryevich YARMOLENKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Surgut Town Court<\/p>\n

22\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

14\/09\/2018<\/td>\n22\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.<\/td>\n40350\/19<\/p>\n

14\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Ilya Stanislavovich KALINOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1996<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Surgut Town Court<\/p>\n

22\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

14\/09\/2018<\/td>\n22\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.<\/td>\n40871\/19<\/p>\n

18\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Ramis Zinatullovich ALLAGULOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Tobolsk District Court of the Tyumen Region<\/p>\n

25\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

30\/10\/2018<\/td>\n25\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23.<\/td>\n41491\/19<\/p>\n

09\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Aris Nugzariyevich BARATOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen<\/p>\n

26\/02\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

30\/11\/2018<\/td>\n26\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.<\/td>\n41833\/19<\/p>\n

22\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Vladislav Vitalyevich SUGAKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1995<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Samara<\/p>\n

19\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

05\/12\/2018<\/td>\n19\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.<\/td>\n43787\/19<\/p>\n

11\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Yevgeniy Borisovich YEROFEYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Pokhvistnevskiy District Court<\/p>\n

19\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

19\/07\/2019<\/td>\n19\/07\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.<\/td>\n44230\/19<\/p>\n

15\/01\/2020<\/td>\n

Aleksey Igorevich BUSHKOVSKIY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

Belinskaya Marina Aleksandrovna<\/p>\n

St Petersburg<\/td>\n

Gatchina Town Cout of the Leningrad Region; Leningrad Regional Court; St Petersburg City Court<\/td>\n10\/11\/2016<\/td>\n03\/10\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27.<\/td>\n44644\/19<\/p>\n

26\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

Oleg Vladimirovich MAYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1964<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Prikubanskiy District Court of Krasnodar<\/p>\n

31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n

21\/09\/2017<\/td>\n31\/01\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.<\/td>\n45179\/19<\/p>\n

06\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZHARIKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Vorkuta Town Court<\/p>\n

18\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

07\/12\/2018<\/td>\n18\/07\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – train, from 29\/05\/2019 to 13\/07\/2019, 0.4 sq. m of personal space, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, not provided with warm meals, passive smoking, no ventilation, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.<\/td>\n45388\/19<\/p>\n

13\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Svetlana Yevgenyevna MORAVSKAYA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1973<\/td>\n

Sapov Yevgeniy Yuryevich<\/p>\n

Samara<\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Samara<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

15\/11\/2018<\/td>\n17\/08\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.<\/td>\n45896\/19<\/p>\n

15\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksandr Gennadyevich MAKARUSHKIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1972<\/td>\n

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Verkhnesaldinskiy District Court of Verkhnyaya Salda;<\/p>\n

Sverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

19\/02\/2019<\/td>\n

23\/08\/2018<\/td>\n19\/02\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31.<\/td>\n46542\/19<\/p>\n

20\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Vladimir Vladimirovich KATKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Serovskiy District Court of the Sverdlovsk Region; Sverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

22\/11\/2018<\/td>\n18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32.<\/td>\n47372\/19<\/p>\n

20\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Vitaliy Vladimirovich KATKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Serovskiy District Court of the Sverdlovsk Region; Sverdlovsk Regional Court (by way of videoconference)<\/p>\n

18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

12\/10\/2018<\/td>\n18\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33.<\/td>\n47573\/19<\/p>\n

07\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Viktor Nikolayevich RADOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1980<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar<\/p>\n

29\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

29\/04\/2019<\/td>\n29\/04\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – train, from 07\/05\/2019 to 08\/05\/2019, overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places,<\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34.<\/td>\n47997\/19<\/p>\n

22\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Vitaliy Vladimirovich SERBAYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1971<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Leninskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

09\/10\/2017<\/td>\n23\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35.<\/td>\n48197\/19<\/p>\n

29\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Roman Sergeyevich RUSSKIKH<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Lesosibirsk Town Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region<\/p>\n

26\/03\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

11\/10\/2018<\/td>\n26\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36.<\/td>\n48600\/19<\/p>\n

26\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich LOGUNOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1984<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar, Komi Republic<\/p>\n

05\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

05\/06\/2019<\/td>\n05\/06\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport \u2013 single-occupancy compartment in a van from 05\/06\/2019 to 16\/09\/2019; lack of space; 0.35 sq. m of personal space<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37.<\/td>\n48909\/19<\/p>\n

04\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

Vladimir Vladimirovich GORAK<\/strong><\/p>\n

2000<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Surgut Town Court<\/p>\n

04\/03\/2019<\/td>\n

28\/12\/2018<\/td>\n04\/03\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38.<\/td>\n48952\/19<\/p>\n

30\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Artem Yuryevich ALEKSANDROV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1987<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

07\/03\/2019<\/td>\n29\/07\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39.<\/td>\n49638\/19<\/p>\n

09\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Yelena Nikolayevna VOLKOVA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Perm Regional Court (by means of video link from settlement colony no. 26 Perm Region)<\/p>\n

17\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

21\/03\/2019<\/td>\n17\/09\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40.<\/td>\n50042\/19<\/p>\n

12\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Aleksandrovich PURGIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1986<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Berezovskiy District Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region<\/p>\n

12\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

27\/04\/2018<\/td>\n12\/07\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41.<\/td>\n52530\/19<\/p>\n

28\/01\/2020<\/td>\n

Ruslan Nikolayevich SHATKO<\/strong><\/p>\n

1988<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Zheleznodorozhnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court (by way of video conference from a metal cage in the detention facility)<\/p>\n

12\/11\/2019<\/td>\n

08\/01\/2019<\/td>\n12\/11\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42.<\/td>\n52822\/19<\/p>\n

19\/09\/2019<\/td>\n

Sergey Aleksandrovich PISHCHUK<\/strong><\/p>\n

1968<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Novosibirsk District Court of the Novosibirsk Region, Novosibirsk Regional Court,<\/p>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Novosibirsk<\/p>\n

21\/08\/2019<\/td>\n

26\/05\/2017<\/td>\n21\/08\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – inhuman conditions in vans in single\u2011occupancy compartments of 0.3 sq. m and in convoy cells between 26\/05\/2017 -16\/09\/2019, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no ventilation, lack or inadequate furniture, passive smoking<\/td>\n

8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43.<\/td>\n54228\/19<\/p>\n

02\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Artem Viktorovich SALTANOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1975<\/td>\n

Matytsin Igor Viktorovich<\/p>\n

Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n

Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

26\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

25\/02\/2019<\/td>\n26\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44.<\/td>\n55222\/19<\/p>\n

02\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Yuriy Aleksandrovich ANDREYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1976<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

13\/06\/2019<\/td>\n

23\/01\/2019<\/td>\n13\/06\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45.<\/td>\n55503\/19<\/p>\n

07\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Dmitriy Yuryevich ZEMLYANUKHIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

1973<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Justice of the Peace, Gornyatskiy District, Vorkuta<\/p>\n

20\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

17\/04\/2019<\/td>\n20\/05\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – train, from 29\/07\/2019 to 31\/07\/2019, lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of ventilation;<\/p>\n

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;<\/p>\n

Art. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention after conviction – in IK-19 Komi Republic, 31\/07\/2019, pending as of 16\/09\/2022; 2 sq. m. of personal space; lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, constant electric light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, overcrowding, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower<\/td>\n

15,100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46.<\/td>\n55530\/19<\/p>\n

12\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Igor Vladimirovich MAZHARA<\/strong><\/p>\n

1990<\/td>\n

Sergeyeva Yelizaveta Alekseyevna<\/p>\n

Tyumen<\/td>\n

Surgut Town Court<\/p>\n

15\/04\/2019<\/td>\n

29\/08\/2018<\/td>\n15\/04\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47.<\/td>\n55743\/19<\/p>\n

08\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Pavel Alekseyevich YEREMEYEV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1992<\/td>\n

Petrov Roman Nikolayevich<\/p>\n

Cheboksary<\/td>\n

Moscovskiy District Court of Cheboksary;<\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO-1, Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic;<\/p>\n

Video link from SIZO-1, Chuvashia Republic<\/p>\n

30\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

01\/04\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

30\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

30\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48.<\/td>\n55904\/19<\/p>\n

12\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Aleksey Igorevich NASTALSKIY<\/strong><\/p>\n

1989<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Megion Town Court of the Khanty-Many Autonomous Region – Yugra<\/p>\n

01\/07\/2019<\/td>\n

06\/07\/2018<\/td>\n01\/07\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49.<\/td>\n56851\/19<\/p>\n

21\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

Ilya Dmitriyevich SOLOVAROV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1994<\/td>\n

Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich<\/p>\n

Nizhniy Tagil<\/td>\n

Serovskiy District Court of the Sverdlovsk Region, Sverdlovsk Regional Court<\/p>\n

21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n

04\/05\/2018<\/td>\n21\/05\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50.<\/td>\n58396\/19<\/p>\n

06\/02\/2020<\/td>\n

Vyacheslav Vyacheslavovich KUZNETSOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1997<\/td>\n

Isayev Ayndi Khamzatovich<\/p>\n

Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/p>\n

07\/10\/2019<\/td>\n

06\/08\/2019<\/td>\n07\/10\/2019<\/td>\nArt. 3 – inadequate conditions of detention during transport – van and detention in a convoy cell at the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court between 06\/08\/2019 and 17\/12\/2019 with 0.2 sq. m per inmate, inadequate temperature, overcrowding, no ventilation, mouldy or dirty cell, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food<\/td>\n8,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51.<\/td>\n58699\/19<\/p>\n

02\/12\/2019<\/td>\n

Anton Valeryevich VNUKOV<\/strong><\/p>\n

1998<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; Zheleznodorozhnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk<\/td>\n21\/09\/2018<\/td>\n06\/09\/2019<\/td>\n<\/td>\n7,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[i]<\/a> Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.<\/p>\n