Communicated on 15 January 2019<\/p>\n
SECOND SECTION<\/p>\n
Application no.77756\/12
\nALTINKUM TUR\u0130ZM VE OTELC\u0130L\u0130K H\u0130ZMETLER\u0130 SANAY\u0130 VE T\u0130CARET A.\u015e. and Kemal ASLAN
\nagainst Turkey
\nlodged on 1 November 2012<\/p>\n
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE<\/p>\n
The application concerns the demolition of a hotel, which was being run by the applicants who had rented it from the Municipality for a period of forty years, and the compensation awarded to them for their damages.<\/p>\n
The applicants complain of a violation of their rights under Article\u00a01 of Protocol No. 1, arguing that the amount of compensation awarded to them and the interest applied to that amount did not provide sufficient remedy for their loss.<\/p>\n
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES<\/p>\n
Has there been a violation of the applicants\u2019 right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, on account of the calculation of the compensation awarded to them and the interest applied to that amount (see, mutatis mutandis<\/em>, Y\u0131lta\u015fY\u0131ld\u0131zTuristikTesisleri A.\u015e. v. Turkey<\/em>,no. 30502\/96, 24 April 2003).<\/p>\n\n\n
\n No.<\/strong><\/td>\n Firstname LASTNAME<\/strong><\/td>\n Birth year<\/strong><\/td>\n Representative<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n 1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Alt\u0131nkumTurizmveOtelcilikHizmetleriSanayiveTicaret A. \u015e.<\/td>\n <\/td>\n A. Aktay<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Kemal ASLAN<\/td>\n 1961<\/td>\n A. Aktay<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n