{"id":7884,"date":"2019-08-11T08:25:41","date_gmt":"2019-08-11T08:25:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=7884"},"modified":"2019-08-11T12:22:13","modified_gmt":"2019-08-11T12:22:13","slug":"6-procedural-issues-in-non-discrimination-law-handbook-on-european-non-discrimination-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweuro.com\/?p=7884","title":{"rendered":"6. Procedural issues in non-discrimination law \u2013 Handbook on European non-discrimination law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Handbook on European non-discrimination law \u2013 Contents<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
EU<\/td>\nIssues covered<\/td>\nCoE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Employment Equality Directive<\/p>\n

(2000\/78\/EC), Art. 10<\/td>\n

Sharing of the<\/p>\n

burden of proof<\/td>\n

ECHR, Art. 3 (prohibition of torture), Art. 14 (prohibition of discrimination)<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Virabyan v. Armenia, No. 40094\/05, 2012<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Timishev v. Russia, Nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, 2005<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Racial Equality<\/p>\n

Directive (2000\/43\/EC), Art. 8<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Gender Goods and Services<\/p>\n

Directive (2004\/113\/EC), Art. 9<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Gender Equality Directive<\/p>\n

(recast) (2006\/54\/EC), Art. 19<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-81\/12, Accept v. Consiliul Na\u0163ional pentru Combaterea<\/p>\n

Discrimin\u0103rii, 2013<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-415\/10, Meister v. Speech Design Carrier Systems<\/p>\n

GmbH, 2012<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-104\/10, Kelly v. National<\/p>\n

University of Ireland, 2011<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-54\/07, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v. Firma<\/p>\n

Feryn NV, 2008<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-381\/99, Brunnhofer<\/p>\n

v. Bank der \u00f6sterreichischen<\/p>\n

Postsparkasse AG, 2001<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-423\/15, Kratzer v. R+V Allgemeine Versicherung AG, 2016<\/p>\n

CJEU, C-54\/07, Centrum voor gelijkheid van kansen en voor racismebestrijding v. Firma<\/p>\n

Feryn NV, 2008<\/td>\n

Circumstances irrelevant for the finding of discrimination<\/td>\nECtHR, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], No. 57325\/00, 2007<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CJEU, C-527\/13, Cachaldora<\/td>\nRole of statistics<\/td>\nECtHR, Di Trizio v. Switzerland, No. 7186\/09, 2016<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Abdu v. Bulgaria, No. 26827\/08, 2014<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Opuz v. Turkey, No. 33401\/02, 2009)<\/p>\n

ECtHR, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], No. 57325\/00, 2007<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Fern\u00e1ndez v. INSS and TGSS<\/p>\n

[GC], 2015<\/td>\n

and other data<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, Joined cases C-4\/02 and<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
C-5\/02, Sch\u00f6nheit v. Stadt<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Frankfurt am Main and Becker v.<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Land Hessen, 2003<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CJEU, C-167\/97, Regina<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
v. Secretary of State for<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Employment, 1999<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Employment Equality Directive, Art. 17<\/p>\n

Racial Equality Directive, Art. 15<\/p>\n

Framework Decision on racism and xenophobia (2008\/913\/JHA)<\/p>\n

CJEU, C-407\/14, Arjona Camacho<\/p>\n

v. Securitas Seguridad Espa\u00f1a, SA, 2015<\/p>\n

CJEU, C-81\/12, Accept v. Consiliul Na\u0163ional pentru Combaterea<\/p>\n

Discrimin\u0103rii, 2013<\/td>\n

Enforcement of non- discrimination law<\/td>\nECHR, Art. 6 (right to fair trial), Art. 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Art. 14 (prohibition of discrimination)<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Sidabras and Others v. Lithuania, No. 50421\/08 and 56213\/08, 2015<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Garc\u00eda Mateos v. Spain, No. 38285\/09, 2013<\/p>\n

ECtHR, Hulea v. Romania, No. 33411\/05, 2012<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Key points<\/p>\n