The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 4815/18 and 21 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024 This…
Author: LawEuro
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – The application concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 29804/16) The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings…
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – 29804/16
The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings against her on a charge of murder. European…
CASE OF SHMAKOVA v. UKRAINE – The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s title to a plot of land following the proceedings brought by a prosecutor to have that land returned to a State-owned plant
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 70445/13) The applicant complained that she had been unlawfully deprived of her property, in that after its reorganisation the plant could not have retained its title to the permanent use of the land…
CASE OF SHMAKOVA v. UKRAINE – 70445/13
The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s title to a plot of land following the proceedings brought by a prosecutor to have that land returned to a State-owned plant, allegedly in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to…
CASE OF TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings
European Court of Human Rights (Applications nos. 61147/13 and 10 others) The applicants complained principally of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 8 of the Convention. The European Court…
CASE OF TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 61147/13 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 61147/13 and 10 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11…
CASE OF GRYGOROV v. UKRAINE – 44442/13
The application concerns the applicant’s complaint that he missed a time-limit for lodging an appeal because the decision of the first-instance court had not been provided to him on time. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GRYGOROV v. UKRAINE (Application no. 44442/13)…
CASE OF BOCHKAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 1698/19 and 32 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOCHKAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 1698/19 and 32 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024 This…
CASE OF TENA ARREGUI v. SPAIN – The application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life and correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention resulting from the interception and disclosure of his emails and the dismissal of a criminal complaint lodged
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 42541/18) The application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life and correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention resulting from the interception and disclosure of his…