European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 33696/19) The case concerns the statutory requirement for “Internet communication organisers” to store all communications data for a duration of one year and the contents of all communications for a duration of six…
Author: LawEuro
CASE OF PODCHASOV v. RUSSIA – 33696/19
The case concerns the statutory requirement for “Internet communication organisers” to store all communications data for a duration of one year and the contents of all communications for a duration of six months, and to submit those data to law-enforcement…
CASE OF GOLTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 28253/19 and 46 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. European Court of Human Rights THIRD SECTION CASE OF GOLTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 28253/19 and 46 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 February…
CASE OF GHIBAN v. ROMANIA – 10862/19
The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention of the prison authorities’ refusal to grant him compassionate leave in order to attend his mother’s funeral. Additionally, he complained under Article 3 of the inadequate conditions of detention in the…
CASE OF BAGIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN – 53360/18 and 27340/19
The applicants complained under Article 11 of the Convention of the prohibition on holding peaceful assemblies or restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF BAGIROV AND…
CASE OF STOROZHUK AND KONONOV v. UKRAINE – 13577/16 and 48768/16
The applicants referred, in particular, to Article 3 of the Convention and alleged that they had been ill-treated by police officers and that the investigation into their complaints had been ineffective. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF STOROZHUK…
CASE OF BILOKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 3779/14 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BILOKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 3779/14 and 2…
CASE OF YESICHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 35659/13
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful and unnecessary eviction of the applicants from a room in a communal flat. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YESICHKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 35659/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 February…
CASE OF JANOČKOVÁ AND KVOCERA v. SLOVAKIA – 39980/22
In the context of extensive litigation concerning the parents’ rights and duties in respect of the second applicant, the case concerns the length and effectiveness of proceedings for the enforcement of an urgent interim measure (neodkladné opatrenie) regulating the first…
CASE OF BOGDAN v. UKRAINE – waiving of his right to a lawyer had not been valid as he had been suffering from the effects of drug addiction and withdrawal symptoms when he signed it
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 3016/16) The applicant challenged the validity of the waiver at the domestic level on two other grounds: firstly, on the ground that no lawyer had been present when the waiver had been signed;…