The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23534/20 and 13110/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9225/20 and 6773/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PANCHENKO AND GEREGLYAD v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 62266/19 and 30697/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF PUSHKARYOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 55770/19
The applicant complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF SUSLOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 46298/19
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the Convention, including under Article 34, having argued that the Government
CASE OF ZALEVSKYY AND VITKOVSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 35093/19 and 2304/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.They also raised other complaints under the Convention.
CASE OF LEONTYEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9262/19
The case originated in an application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 6 February 2019.
CASE OF MAKAROV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 49715/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BÍRÓ AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 77948/13 and 2 others
The applicants complained of unlawful detention and also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.