The application concerns the criminal conviction of the applicants – a former member of the Federation Council (one of the chambers of the Russian Federal Assembly) and his son-in-law, a chief inspector of the Russian Chamber
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KHUTSISHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54584/08 and 3 others
The present case concerns the holding of the applicants’ trials in camera
CASE OF KUDAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4261/06 and 28 others
The applicants alleged that they had been subjected to police ill‑treatment in the aftermath of the terrorist attack of 2005 in Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkaria, and that no effective investigation into the matter had been carried out.
CASE OF PINKAS AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 8701/21
The application concerns the issue of meal, travel and family separation allowances for the judges and the judicial clerks at the State level. Although the same legislation applies to both categories,
CASE OF PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17808/19 and 36972/19
The case concerns the applicants’ complaints that they had been forced to leave their homes and prevented from returning subsequently, and that the authorities had refused them protection in an environment
CASE OF BESNIK CANI v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37474/20
The applicant is a former prosecutor and the case concerns his complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Special Appeal Chamber that dismissed him from his former office was not “a tribunal established by law”
CASE OF ANGERJÄRV AND GREINOMAN v. ESTONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16358/18 and 34964/18
The similar applications by two lawyers concern the fact that it was impossible for them to challenge decisions by which judges had removed them from court proceedings for obstructing the proceedings
CASE OF KARA-MURZA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2513/14
The case concerns the annulment of the applicant’s registration as a candidate for election to a regional legislature on the ground of his having two nationalities.
CASE OF DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS (European Court of Human Rights) 58342/15
The case concerns the use of documents for the re-setting of a tax fine. Those documents relate to a foreign bank account and had been obtained from the applicant under threat of substantial penalty payments.
CASE OF KOPIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16789/19
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention.