The applicants complained of the unlawful detention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KLESHCHEVNIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 48458/13 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF MAKSIMENKO v. UKRAINE (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 45547/13
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention about his handcuffing in a courtroom and, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention,
CASE OF SOROKOUMOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 44584/13 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GUSMERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 50345/10 and 5 others
The applicants lodged claims with the national courts, contending that the INPS’s calculation methods were contrary to the spirit of the Italo-Swiss Convention.
CASE OF LACEJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22122/08
The applicants complained in substance of the excessive length of civil proceedings, in particular those before the Supreme Court.
CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 52750/19 and 42931/20
The case originated in two applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”).
CASE OF ANASTASI AND OTHERS v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 49102/19 and 2 others
The facts of this case are substantially the same as those described in Bartolo Parnis and Others v. Malta ((dec.), nos. 49378/18 and 3 others, 24 March 2020),
CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 43993/19 and 2 others
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KATANOVIĆ AND MIHOVILOVIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18208/19 and 12922/20
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.