The application concerns, in the main, the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the conduct and outcome
Category: European Court of Human Rights
McCann and Healy v. Portugal (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 McCann and Healy v. Portugal – 57195/17 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life
Y.P. v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Y.P. v. Russia – 43399/13 Judgment 20.9.2022 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life
CASE OF AVRAAMOVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2718/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention relating to the conditions of her detention, the alleged inadequacy of her medical treatment
CASE OF ORISHCHENKO AND REGION-36 v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50690/11
Mr Orishchenko is the owner of the website domain and a CEO of Region-36, a PR-company providing informational consulting services and publishing information on the website
CASE OF NADTOCHIY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 32899/13
The case concerns allegedly unlawful and disproportionate deprivation of the applicant’s property, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
CASE OF PODLESNAYA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23002/13
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful pre-trial detention of the applicant under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and the alleged absence of relevant guarantees afforded to her under Article
CASE OF KORNATSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 19854/13
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1.
CASE OF ZHVAVYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 6781/13
The case concerns defamation proceedings initiated against the applicant for the statements he had made in his complaints to the law-enforcement authorities and before the courts.
CASE OF KOLESNIKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 988/13
The case concerns the alleged arbitrariness of and lack of justification for the applicant’s pre-trial detention and the alleged absence of a meaningful review of the lawfulness of his detention,