The applicant complained of different aspects relating to his detention and, in particular, about permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facility. THIRD SECTION CASE OF PUZANOV v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 26895/14 and 2 others – see appended list)…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SOVETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32992/13 and 12 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF SOVETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA…
CASE OF LITVINOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6890/13
The applicant complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings. THIRD SECTION CASE OF LITVINOV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 6890/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 September 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.…
CASE OF BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 21205/12 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 21205/12 and 5 others –…
CASE OF HABILAJ v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2480/10
The applicant complained of the delayed enforcement of domestic decisions. He also raised other complaints under the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF HABILAJ v. ALBANIA (Application no. 2480/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 September 2022 This judgment is final but it may…
CASE OF KHRYAPKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26190/08
The applicant complained that he had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHRYAPKO v. RUSSIA (Application no. 26190/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG…
CASE OF M.K. v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 24867/13
The application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention in that a blood test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was unlawfully performed on her during a regular…
CASE OF ZAKARPATSKA OBLASNA SPILKA SPOZHYVCHYKH TOVARYSTV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 65719/10 and 2 others
The case principally concerns the alleged restriction of the applicants’ access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention following a decision of the Constitutional Court interpreting the competence of the Supreme Court in the resolution of…
CASE OF ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 22287/08
The case concerns defamation proceedings against the applicant following the publication of an article he had written on alleged judicial corruption and an injunction ordering to take down the publication in question from the newspaper’s website pending the examination of…
CASE OF VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 62209/17 and 50933/18
The case concerns the adequacy of the applicant’s medical treatment in detention and his placement in a metal cage during court hearings, allegedly in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, as well as the lawfulness of and justification for…