The present application concerns alleged reprisals against the applicant and the manner in which he was treated by the prison authorities after the delivery of the Court’s judgment in respect
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF RABCZEWSKA v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 8257/13
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for blasphemous statements made about the Holy Bible.
Timur Sharipov v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Timur Sharipov v. Russia – 15758/13 Judgment 13.9.2022 [Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression
Gilanov v. the Republic of Moldova (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Gilanov v. the Republic of Moldova – 44719/10 Judgment 13.9.2022 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention
CASE OF BAŞER AND ÖZÇELİK v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 30694/15 and 30803/15
The present applications concern the pre-trial detention of the applicants, judges of the 29th and 32nd Istanbul Criminal Courts respectively, at the time of the events,
CASE OF GILANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 44719/10
The case concerns the applicant’s detention abroad on the basis of an allegedly expired detention order issued by a Moldovan court, as well as his insufficient representation in the domestic proceedings.
CASE OF TIMUR SHARIPOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15758/13
The case concerns the applicant’s removal from a polling station, where he was an observer during the 2011 Russian legislative elections.
H.F. and Others v. France [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 H.F. and Others v. France [GC] – 24384/19 Judgment 14.9.2022 [GC] Article 3 of Protocol No. 4 Article 3 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 Enter own country
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE (European Court of Human Rights) 24384/19 and 44234/20
The applicants alleged that the refusal by the respondent State to repatriate their daughters and grandchildren, who were being held in camps in north-eastern Syria,
Ete v. Türkiye (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 265 August-September 2022 Ete v. Türkiye – 28154/20 Judgment 6.9.2022 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression