The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GOLIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 64191/11 and 2 others
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF MARGIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF SEMYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF MATVEYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54430/08
The case originated in four applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF SAIDOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 31872/19
The present case under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerns the applicant’s allegedly unlawful detention between 10 and 24 December 2018.
CASE OF SMIRNOV AND NOVOSELOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 11005/19
The applicants complained under Article 8 of the Convention that the removal order issued against the first applicant was a disproportionate sanction which disrupted their family life.
CASE OF MAGOMAYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 10829/11
The case concerns the death of the applicant’s son as a result of a special operation carried out by State agents.
CASE OF SHELEG v. RUSSIA – 27494/06. The case concerns the applicant’s dismissal from her judicial office based on interception of her telephone conversations by unknown persons
The case concerns the applicant’s dismissal from her judicial office in accordance with the decision of the Regional Judicial Qualifications Board based on interception of her telephone conversations by unknown persons,
Darboe and Camara v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Darboe and Camara v. Italy – 5797/17 Judgment 21.7.2022 [Section I]