Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Tagiyeva v. Azerbaijan – 72611/14 Judgment 7.7.2022 [Section V]
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Chocholáč v. Slovakia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 264 July 2022 Chocholáč v. Slovakia – 81292/17 Judgment 7.7.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF MEDAK AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 45689/21 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of administrative proceedings. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MEDAK AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF FEKETE AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 44057/20 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF HAOUARI v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 29440/16
The application concerns the legal basis of the applicant’s detention with a view to deportation. It raises issues under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF YEPIKHIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 29389/19
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KOZLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53267/18 and 8242/19
The applicant complained of excessive length of pre-trial detention, the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention and about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him.
CASE OF MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 38503/18 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF TOKARENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30472/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26363/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect.