The case concerns the fairness of criminal appeal proceedings, owing to the alleged failure of the Supreme Court to render a reasoned judgment which was sufficiently clear as to its outcome, in view of that court’s tied vote.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF DROUSIOTIS v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 42315/15
The case concerns a judgment given against a journalist in civil defamation proceedings. The applicant complained of a breach of his right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention.
CASE OF ASSOCIATION OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND UNION FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) 815/18 and 4 others
The applications concern the compatibility with Article 11 of the Convention of the Uniformity of Collective Agreements Act (Tarifeinheitsgesetz), which regulates conflicts that arise if several collective agreements
CASE OF BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 55617/17
Raising mainly issues under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, this case concerns the non-enforcement against the National Property Fund of Slovakia (“NPF”), the country’s privatisation agency, of an arbitration award made by the International Court of Arbitration (“the ICA”)
Azadliq and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 Azadliq and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan – 20755/08 Judgment 30.6.2022 [Section V]
BTS Holding, a.s. v. Slovakia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 BTS Holding, a.s. v. Slovakia – 55617/17 Judgment 30.6.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF AHMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 52286/11
The present case concerns the applicant’s conviction in administrative proceedings against him on the charge of failure to comply with the lawful order of a police officer. The applicant alleged that his rights protected under Article
CASE OF A.B. AND OTHERS v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 42907/17
The present case concerns refusal of border guards to receive the applicants’ asylum applications and summary removal to a third country, with a risk of refoulement to and ill-treatment in the country origin.
CASE OF RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 15269/13
The present application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicant. In particular, the applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that his conviction had been based on a jury verdict that had…
CASE OF AZADLIQ AND ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 20755/08
The application, lodged by a newspaper and its chief editor, concerns an allegedly unjustified and disproportionate interference with their right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention