The application concerns a restriction of the applicant’s property rights consisting of an ex lege unpaid easement over a flat in her ownership. The easement had been created on the basis of restitution legislation from 1992 and was in favour…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF D v. LATVIA – 76680/17
The case concerns the applicant’s allegation that he experienced inhuman and degrading treatment primarily under Article 3 of the Convention owing to the prevalent informal prisoner hierarchy in the prisons where he was incarcerated. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION…
CASE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN THE NKR AGAINST ARMENIA
Resolution CM/ResDH (2023) 396 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Christian Religious Organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the NKR against Armenia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 December 2023 at the 1484th meeting…
CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL – 30138/21
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 30138/21) JUDGMENT Art 3 (substantive) • Inhuman treatment • Degrading treatment • Art 5 § 1 (e) • Persons of unsound mind • Preventive detention…
CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL – The applicant complained of the conditions of his detention in Caxias Prison Hospital and submitted that he should have been held in a psychiatric facility in order to have access to the requisite medical care
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 30138/21) The application concerns, under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention, the applicant’s detention in the psychiatric unit of the Caxias Prison Hospital. Following his conviction on charges of criminal damage, making…
CASE OF NARAYAN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN – 54363/17 and two others
The case concerns alleged violations of Articles 2, 13 and 14 of the Convention in connection with the killing of the applicants’ relatives by Mr Çingiz Gurbanov, a soldier in the Azerbaijani Armed Forces, who allegedly crossed the border and initiated…
CASE OF O.J. AND J.O. v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA – 42126/15 and 42127/15
The applications concern the applicants’ complaints that they had been ill-treated during their arrest and subsequent unlawful detention in the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, Georgia, (hereinafter “Abkhazia”) and that they had not received a fair hearing in the proceedings before…
CASE OF NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA – 14139/21
The case concerns various remand measures applied against the applicant in the context of a high-profile criminal investigation relating to his involvement in the acquisition by the Lithuanian government of a large number of COVID-19 tests. SECOND SECTION CASE OF…
CASE OF MATKAVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 3963/18
The case concerns the applicants’ complaints that their close relative, who was respectively their son, husband and father, had been killed by a border guard of the de facto Abkhaz authorities and that there had been no effective investigation into…
CASE OF M.L. v. POLAND – The case concerns restrictions on abortion on the grounds of foetal abnormalities which were introduced by the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 22 October 2020
European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF M.L. v. POLAND (Application no. 40119/21) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Private life • Prohibition of abortion on grounds of foetal abnormality following amendments introduced by the Constitutional Court, resulting in the…