Resolution CM/ResDH (2023) 396 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Christian Religious Organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the NKR against Armenia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 December 2023 at the 1484th meeting…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL – 30138/21
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 30138/21) JUDGMENT
CASE OF MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL – The applicant complained of the conditions of his detention in Caxias Prison Hospital and submitted that he should have been held in a psychiatric facility in order to have access to the requisite medical care
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 30138/21) The application concerns, under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention, the applicant’s detention in the psychiatric unit of the Caxias Prison Hospital. Following his conviction on charges of criminal damage, making…
CASE OF NARAYAN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN – 54363/17 and two others
The case concerns alleged violations of Articles 2, 13 and 14 of the Convention in connection with the killing of the applicants’ relatives by Mr Çingiz Gurbanov, a soldier in the Azerbaijani Armed Forces, who allegedly crossed the border and initiated…
CASE OF O.J. AND J.O. v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA – 42126/15 and 42127/15
The applications concern the applicants’ complaints that they had been ill-treated during their arrest and subsequent unlawful detention in the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, Georgia, (hereinafter “Abkhazia”) and that they had not received a fair hearing in the proceedings before…
CASE OF NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA – 14139/21
The case concerns various remand measures applied against the applicant in the context of a high-profile criminal investigation relating to his involvement in the acquisition by the Lithuanian government of a large number of COVID-19 tests.
CASE OF MATKAVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 3963/18
The case concerns the applicants’ complaints that their close relative, who was respectively their son, husband and father, had been killed by a border guard of the de facto Abkhaz authorities and that there had been no effective investigation into…
CASE OF M.L. v. POLAND – The case concerns restrictions on abortion on the grounds of foetal abnormalities which were introduced by the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 22 October 2020
European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF M.L. v. POLAND (Application no. 40119/21) JUDGMENT
CASE OF HUMPERT AND OTHERS v. GERMANY – 59433/18, 59477/18, 59481/18 and 59494/18
The applicants, teachers with civil servant status (Beamte), complained, in particular, about the disciplinary measures against them for having participated, during their working hours, in strikes which had been organised by the trade union of which they were members.
CASE OF HUMPERT AND OTHERS v. GERMANY – The applicants, teachers with civil servant status (Beamte), complained, in particular, about the disciplinary measures against them for having participated, during their working hours, in strikes which had been organised by the trade union of which they were members
European Court of Human Rights (Applications nos. 59433/18, 59477/18, 59481/18 and 59494/18) At the relevant time, the four applicants were State school teachers with civil servant status employed by different German Länder. They were members of the Trade Union for…