The present case concerns refusal of border guards to receive the applicants’ asylum applications and summary removal to a third country, with a risk of refoulement to and ill-treatment in the country origin.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
M.D. and Others v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 M.D. and Others v. Spain – 36584/17 Judgment 28.6.2022 [Section III]
CASE OF SOKOLOVAS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 10049/20
The case concerns the use of an electroshock device by the police against the applicant and the investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment.
CASE OF ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 64251/16 and 49 others
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish
CASE OF APOPII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 32617/16
The case concerns the alleged lack of effectiveness of the investigation into acts of violence committed by private individuals against the applicant. The applicant complained of a violation of his rights under Articles
CASE OF TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. NORTH MACEDONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 11828/16
The case mainly concerns the applicants’ complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that they had been denied the opportunity to have knowledge of, and comment on, the defendant’s submissions in civil proceedings in which
CASE OF KABAR v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 38597/14
The application concerns civil proceedings brought by the applicants against other individuals before the Hazro Cadastral Court concerning a cadastral dispute, in which they argued that a plot of land, allegedly owned by them,
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 36584/17
The application concerns the applicants’ right to privacy and to protection of their own respective image (Article 8 of the Convention) as well as their right to freedom of expression (Article 10 of the Convention).
Grosam v. the Czech Republic (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 Grosam v. the Czech Republic – 19750/13 Judgment 23.6.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF KHARLAMOV AND SHCHERBATENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40959/19 and 19258/20
The applicants complained of the domestic courts’ failure to ensure their participation in hearings in the civil proceedings to which they were parties.