The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF TURCIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 46051/19 and 14 others – see appended list)
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF TRENCHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 65143/19 and 14 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF DIACONU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8806/20 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
CASE OF PJONTEKOVÁ AND PETEJOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 52505/20 and 52832/20
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings that they had initiated, respectively, on 13 May 1999 and on 26 April 2001 before the Bardejov District Court seeking payment of unjust enrichment.
CASE OF BELOSLUDTSEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8806/20 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF BUDAGHYAN AND CHUGASZYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 56589/15 and 56596/15
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BUDAGHYAN AND CHUGASZYAN v. ARMENIA (Applications nos. 56589/15 and 56596/15 – see appended list)
CASE OF VASSILYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20193/15 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. In applications nos. 20193/15 and 36396/17, the applicants also raised complaints under Article 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF CIANCHELLA v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 65808/13 and 2 others
The case concerns legislative intervention in the course of ongoing civil proceedings. The applicants complained that the enactment of Law no. 296 of 27 December 2006 (“Law no. 296/2006”)
CASE OF MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4693/12 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KHALIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35205/19 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.