The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MKHITARYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA (Application no. 4693/12 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KHALIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35205/19 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHALIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 35205/19 and 8 others – see…
CASE OF HEGEDIŠ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41306/18
The case concerns the applicant’s inability to use her flat occupied by a protected lessee. FIRST SECTION CASE OF HEGEDIŠ v. CROATIA (Application no. 41306/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 June 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to…
CASE OF PESTRIKOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 52548/17
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of her detention, which were incompatible with her disabilities and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. She also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE…
CASE OF ARAMBAŠIN v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 48981/17 and 49727/17
The present case concerns the applicants’ inability to use their flats or to collect an adequate rent from their tenants. FIRST SECTION CASE OF ARAMBAŠIN v. CROATIA (Applications nos. 48981/17 and 49727/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 June 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF IBISHBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 45929/17
The case originated in an application against Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 20 June 2017. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF IBISHBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN…
CASE OF IVANTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20509/17 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention, which were incompatible with their disabilities and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION…
CASE OF VASS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7175/17 and 14 others
The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. The applicants complained…
CASE OF KOZIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1993/17
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOZIN v.…
CASE OF MUKHIN AND BASIYEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24655/16 and 57261/17
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table THIRD SECTION CASE…