The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him had been unfair because the proceedings before a pre-trial judge which had confirmed a public prosecutor’s decision to indict him had breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF ALGIRDAS BUTKEVIČIUS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 70489/17
The case concerns a complaint by the applicant, who is the former Prime Minister of the Republic of Lithuania, that the State authorities had breached his right to private life and correspondence by disclosing one of his telephone conversations to…
CASE OF ECODEFENCE AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9988/13 and 60 others
The present cases concern restrictions on the freedom of expression and association of Russian non-governmental organisations (NGOs) which have been categorised as “foreign agents”
CASE OF L.B. v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 38121/20
The case concerns the Lithuanian authorities’ refusal to issue a travel document to the applicant, a permanent resident previously granted subsidiary protection, on the grounds that he could request such a document
CASE OF STOYANOVA v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 56070/18
The case concerns the alleged failure by the Bulgarian authorities to give a proper legal response to the homophobic motives underlying the murder of the applicant’s son – a failure alleged to be due to, in particular,
CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA – 49270/11. The case concerns the applicants’ allegations of discrimination in the calculation of their State pensions as permanently resident non-citizens of Latvia, as contrasted with Latvian citizens
The present case concerns the difference in treatment between citizens of Latvia and “permanently resident non-citizens” (nepilsoņi) of Latvia with regard to the calculation of their retirement pensions, through the exclusion,
CASE OF DA SILVA SANTOS PEREIRA AND DIAMANTINO DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL (European Court of Human Rights) 4581/20 and 55438/20
The case originated in two applications against Portugal lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF DILMUKHAMETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50711/19 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF ZUBEL v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 10932/18
The present case concerns the allegedly excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand.
CASE OF A.A.A. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 37327/17
The case concerns the confinement of the applicant family in the Hungarian transit zone. The applicants complained that the conditions of their confinement in the Tompa transit zone had been incompatible with the guarantees