The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF YUDINTSEV AND SHISTEROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 78144/13 and 18082/14
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF ANDREYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32711/13
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 2 April 2013.
CASE OF BELEVITIN AND AGARKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9456/13 and 1474/14
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF MAGYAR AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 38668/20 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF SERKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 61059/19 and 10 others
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF HASANALI ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN – 42858/11. The case concerns the eviction of the applicants from a State-owned flat
The case concerns the eviction of the applicants from a State-owned flat and raises issues mainly under Article 8 of the Convention.
CASE OF MARIA AZZOPARDI v. MALTA – 22008/20. The case concerns a complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in relation to the Building Development Areas Act (‘BDAA”), enacted in 1983 and repealed in 1988, by which the applicant’s land was expropriated
FIRST SECTION CASE OF MARIA AZZOPARDI v. MALTA (Application no. 22008/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 June 2022 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.
Patrício Monteiro Telo de Abreu v. Portugal – 42713/15 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 Patrício Monteiro Telo de Abreu v. Portugal – 42713/15 Judgment 7.6.2022 [Section IV]
CASE OF FOUTAS ARISTIDOU v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 11990/15
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the criminal proceedings with the District Court of Limassol as well as a delay on the part