The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. The applicants complained of the…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF BESEDA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 60699/11
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 20 December 2005. The applicant complained of the delayed enforcement…
CASE OF KLIMIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33126/08
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 9 April 2008. The applicant complained of the excessive length of…
Lings v. Denmark (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 261 April 2022 Lings v. Denmark – 15136/20 Judgment 12.4.2022 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Justified and proportionate conviction and suspended prison sentence imposed on pro-euthanasia physician for assistance and…
CASE OF LINGS v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 15136/20
By a final judgment of the Supreme Court of 23 September 2019, the applicant, a retired physician, and member of an association in favour of euthanasia, was convicted of two counts of assisted suicide, and one count of attempted assisted suicide…
Legal summary – Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings
Case-law Information Note 261 April 2022 Advisory opinion requested by the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court Request no. P16-2020-002 8.4.2022 [GC] Legal summary Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Stand for election Advisory opinion on the assessment of the proportionality of…
Advisory opinion on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings
GRAND CHAMBER ADVISORY OPINION on the assessment, under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, of the proportionality of a general prohibition on standing for election after removal from office in impeachment proceedings Requested by the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative…
CASE OF MIKLIĆ v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41023/19
The case concerns the applicant’s compulsory psychiatric internment following his criminal conviction for intrusive behaviour and uttering threats, which he was found to have committed while lacking mental capacity. The applicant complains that the prolongation of his compulsory psychiatric internment…
CASE OF FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 32734/11
The applicant complained in particular that the criminal proceedings against him had been in breach of Article 6 of the Convention because he had been convicted on the basis of planted and fabricated evidence; he had not been given an…
CASE OF GLOVELI v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18952/18
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of a violation of her right of access to a court on account of her inability to have recourse to a judicial review of the decision…