These two applications arise out of employment claims brought before the English courts by the applicants against their former employers. In each case the employer – the Republic of Sudan and the State of Libya respectively
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 28470/12
The applicant company alleged that the revocation by the Audiovisual Coordinating Council (“the ACC”) of the broadcasting licence of its television channel of the same name (NIT) on 5 April 2012 had amounted to a violation of Article 10
N.B. and Others v. France – 49775/20 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 N.B. and Others v. France – 49775/20 Judgment 31.3.2022 [Section V]
CASE OF ASHIKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 63458/19 and 24910/20
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated
CASE OF VAVILIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35249/19 and 33919/20
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated
CASE OF KĽAČANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8116/19
The case originated in an application against Slovakia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 6 February 2019.
CASE OF SZABBAH AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 41602/17 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF BANDER AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 21980/21 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF BARTUS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 10214/21 and 4 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated
CASE OF YUDIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45508/13
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17 June 2013.