The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KARIMBAYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26627/05
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 12 July 2005.
CASE OF MASLÁK v. SLOVAKIA (No.2) (European Court of Human Rights) 38321/17 and 8 others
The present nine applications concern execution of a part of the applicant’s prison sentence in a special security prison regime and the legal framework governing it.
CASE OF HAKOBYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 11222/12
The applicant was involved in an altercation with the police, after which he was taken to a police station where, immediately upon arrival, he was allegedly beaten by four police officers in the duty unit of the station.
CASE OF GHUKASYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32986/10
The case concerns the expropriation of the applicants’ property in the centre of Yerevan and the ensuing proceedings. The applicants raise complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
CASE OF AKSENOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 13706/08
The case concerns the applicant’s allegation of ineffective investigation into medical negligence which, according to him, resulted in the death of his son.
CASE OF SHERSTOBITOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 14697/18
On 18 September 2017 the Prikubanskiy District Court in Krasnodar fined the applicant, who was married to a Russian national, 2,000 roubles (about 30 euros) for overstaying the term of authorised stay in Russia
CASE OF BURIYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42874/18
The case concerns the applicant’s deportation to Tajikistan despite the interim measure being indicated under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
CASE OF RAKHMONOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 296/18
The first applicant lived in Russia since December 2013, when he married the second applicant, with whom he has two minor children. The second applicant and the applicants’ children are Russian nationals. The applicants’ family lived in Perm.
CASE OF CHIRIKOV AND NEKRASOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 47942/17 and 58664/17
On 20 December 2016, at the anniversary of the Soviet security service – All-Russian Extraordinary Commission (Cheka) – the applicants, political activists, made an installation “A new Chekist[1]”.