The applicants are Syrian nationals and complain that they would face a real risk of being subjected to death or ill‑treatment in the event of their removal to Syria.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF N.K. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45761/18
The case concerns removal of the applicant to Tajikistan, in breach of an interim measure issued by the Court, and the conditions and lawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending removal. Articles 3, 5 and 34
CASE OF VOOL AND TOOMIK v. ESTONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7613/18 and 12222/18
The case concerns a statutory ban on remand prisoners receiving long-term family visits, despite such visits being generally authorised for convicted prisoners.
CASE OF STARKEVIČ v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7512/18
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaints about the right to a fair hearing and right to respect for his private life on account of the use of information obtained during a criminal investigation in subsequent
CASE OF LANIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 48309/19
The applicant is a convicted prisoner who is nearly blind. He complained that, in view of his visual impairment, his detention was incompatible with Article 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF MICKOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 39107/18 and 39726/18
The case concerns the alleged interference with the applicant’s rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention as a result of the temporary suspension of his bailiff practice’s activities
CASE OF PÁLKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 30262/13
The present case concerns the approach applied by the Czech authorities in fixing the compensation paid to the applicants for the expropriation of their property and the proportionality of its amount.
CASE OF WYSZYŃSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 66/12
The case concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to grant the applicant compensation for a tenant who had occupied his flat without a valid legal title, which the applicant claimed amounted to interference with
CASE OF ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 5386/10
The application, lodged under Articles 6 § 1, 8, 10, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, mainly concerns an allegedly unlawful seizure and destruction of a book manuscript
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 30254/18
The application concerns complaints under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention relating to proceedings between the applicant and her ex-partner, and proceedings against relevant administrative decisions,