Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Y and Others v. Bulgaria – 9077/18 Judgment 22.3.2022 [Section IV]
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SHUMILINA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32128/08
On 9 July 2001 at around 4.30 a.m. officer N. attempted to arrest the applicant’s son and his friend, both young people apparently had been involved in a street fight earlier that morning. They tried to escape. N.
CASE OF RAGIMOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54611/18
The applicants complained about ill-treatment during arrest and lack of effective investigation in this regard, under Article 3 of the Convention; about the first applicant’s unrecorded detention under Article
CASE OF DAURBEKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 60844/11 and 2 others
The applications concern, among other things, alleged ill-treatment of the applicants at the hands of State officials and the lack of a proper investigation in that regard.
CASE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES IN THE NKR v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 41817/10
The case concerns complaints, raised under Articles 9, 11 and 14 of the Convention, that the “NKR” authorities’ refusal to register the applicant as a religious organisation infringed its right to freedom of religion
CASE OF FILIPPOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19355/09
The present application concerns the ill-treatment and death of the applicants’ son, Pte Ye.F., during his compulsory military service, and the subsequent investigation.
CASE OF Y AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9077/18
The applicants are the relatives of a woman killed by her husband, who had been harassing her for several months. The main questions in the case are (a) whether the authorities were under a duty to take reasonable operational
CASE OF GVOZDEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 69997/11
The application concerns an alleged failure by the national authorities to protect the life of the applicant’s son during his military service and to conduct an effective investigation into his death.
CASE OF T.K. AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 55978/20
The case concerns the decisions by the Lithuanian authorities to refuse requests for asylum lodged by the applicants and to remove them to Tajikistan. The applicants complained that their removal would put
CASE OF COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 13472/18
The present case concerns the positive obligations of the authorities under Article 3 regarding the medical treatment of a person with a serious illness in its terminal phase, as well as the compatibility