Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 OOO Memo v. Russia – 2840/10 Judgment 15.3.2022 [Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression No legitimate aim for civil defamation proceedings against a media outlet, seeking to protect…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Bjarki H. Diego v. Iceland – 30965/17 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Bjarki H. Diego v. Iceland – 30965/17 Judgment 15.3.2022 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Article 6-3-a Information on nature and cause of accusation Article 6-3-c Defence through legal…
Communaute genevoise d’action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland – 21881/20 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Communaute genevoise d’action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland – 21881/20 Judgment 15.3.2022 [Section III] Article 11 Article 11-1 Freedom of peaceful assembly Blanket ban on public meetings for two and a half…
Nikitina v. Russia – 8051/20 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Nikitina v. Russia – 8051/20 Judgment 15.3.2022 [Section III] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Return to the State of…
CASE OF OOO MEMO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2840/10
The case concerns civil defamation proceedings brought by the Administration of the Volgograd Region against an Internet media outlet following the publication of an interview with a third party. The applicant company is the founder of Kavkazskiy Uzel («Кавказский узел»,…
CASE OF TETIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 25885/19 and 37 others
The applications concern the non-enforcement of domestic courts’ decisions despite the Compensation Commission’s findings of breach of the applicants’ right to a fair trial. SECOND SECTION CASE OF TETİK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 25885/19 and 37 others) JUDGMENT…
CASE OF STRAISTĂ v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 14191/14
The case concerns the authorities’ alleged failure to fulfil their positive obligation to protect the applicant against an on-going violation of her right to private life and to carry out an effective investigation into her complaints. SECOND SECTION CASE OF…
CASE OF IURCOVSCAIA AND PAVLOVSCHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 74360/12 and 78119/14
The case concerns the interception of the applicants’ telephone communications in the framework of criminal proceedings against other persons. Both applicants complain of a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the insufficient safeguards provided by domestic…
CASE OF KARAHASANOĞLU v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 2458/11
The application concerns the suspension of personal liability lawsuits against the applicant pending the outcome of other procedures and proceedings, and the temporary injunctions placed on his assets during this period. The applicant is a former executive and director of…
CASE OF BOZHILOVI v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9051/18
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicants for property of a predecessor of theirs, which was expropriated by the municipal authorities in Sofia in 1985 for urban development. By virtue of an order of 10 July…