The case concerns an alleged violation of the presumption of innocence. A trial court convicted the applicant and twenty other defendants of fraud and participation in an organised criminal group.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF USPENSKIY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 50734/12
The traffic police stopped the applicant’s car on 16 November 2011. He had no driving licence or passport on him and appeared to be drunk. He was taken to the local police station,
CASE OF OOO TRUZHENIK-89 AND OOO FIRMA MOAZ v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 34336/10 and 30108/13
The applications concern the non-enforcement of judgments in the applicant companies’ favour issued against a State unitary enterprise (for the legal status of unitary enterprises, see Liseytseva and Maslov v. Russia,
CASE OF ELİF NAZAN ŞEKER v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 41954/10
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant owing to the domestic authorities’ alleged failure to respect her right to defend herself through
CASE OF ZAKHAROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 12736/10
The present case concerns alleged discrimination against the applicants on the grounds of their trade union membership and activities and the failure of the domestic courts to address their complaint in that regard.
CASE OF EKREM CAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 10613/10
The application concerns the alleged breach of the applicants’ right to freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Convention on account of their conviction for having staged a protest in a courthouse,
CASE OF Y.Y. AND Y.Y. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43229/18
The present case concerns the lengthy non-enforcement of domestic court judgments granting the first applicant a residence order in respect of the second applicant.
Shorazova v. Malta (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Shorazova v. Malta – 51853/19 Judgment 3.3.2022 [Section I]
CASE OF PĪLĀGS v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 66897/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the domestic courts did not properly examine his allegations of incitement in the administrative offence proceedings against him.
CASE OF SHORAZOVA v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 51853/19
The case concerns proceedings relating to a request for legal assistance and a consequent freezing order on the applicant’s property, which had its basis in a request in connection with criminal proceedings ongoing in Kazakhstan against her. It raises issues…