SECOND SECTION CASE OF GOSPODĂRIA ŢĂRĂNEASCĂ ‘ALCAZ G.A.’ v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 72968/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF RUSU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 68373/14
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF RUSU v. ROMANIA (Application no. 68373/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF MOSEYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 78618/13
THIRD SECTION CASE OF MOSEYEV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 78618/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 54261/13 and 18361/16
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA (Applications nos. 54261/13 and 18361/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022
CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30779/13
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 30779/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF ORAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 32043/11
SECOND SECTION CASE OF ORAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Application no. 32043/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022
CASE OF FEDOTOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2064/10
THIRD SECTION CASE OF FEDOTOVA v. RUSSIA (Application no. 2064/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 March 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF SALA KHAMIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32267/08 and 3 others
The applications concern the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment by State officials and unrecorded detention between 2000 and 2008 in Chechnya and Ingushetia, and the alleged ineffective investigations in that regard.
CASE OF FENECH v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) 19090/20
The case concerns the applicant’s conditions of detention in the Corradino Correctional Facility and whether the Maltese authorities took adequate measures to safeguard the applicant, who only has one kidney, against any potential future Covid-19 infection in the prison.
CASE OF STĂVILĂ v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23126/16
The applicant complained that the reopening of criminal proceedings against him, and his subsequent conviction, had breached his rights to defence, equality of arms, not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence, and to an effective remedy,