The case concerns the applicant’s conditions of detention in the Corradino Correctional Facility and whether the Maltese authorities took adequate measures to safeguard the applicant, who only has one kidney, against any potential future Covid-19 infection in the prison. FIRST…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF STĂVILĂ v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 23126/16
The applicant complained that the reopening of criminal proceedings against him, and his subsequent conviction, had breached his rights to defence, equality of arms, not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence, and to an effective remedy,…
CASE OF I.V.Ț. v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 35582/15
The applicant, aged eleven at the material time, was interviewed without prior parental consent about the accidental death of a schoolmate during a school trip, and the interview was broadcast on television. The higher domestic courts dismissed the civil proceedings…
CASE OF ROMANOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 5159/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained about the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. In application no. 22453/21 the applicant also raised other complaints under the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ROMANOV AND OTHERS…
CASE OF LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 1561/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 1561/21 and 9 others – see…
CASE OF HADOBÁS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 44841/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF HADOBÁS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 44841/20 and 4 others – see appended…
CASE OF BAYLO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BAYLO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 21848/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022 This…
CASE OF DATSKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 14609/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF DATSKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 14609/20 and 2 others – see appended list)…
CASE OF PUKHYR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 10791/20 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PUKHYR AND OTHERS v.…
CASE OF GRYSHKO AND KOSHLYAK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 72970/13 and 12818/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GRYSHKO AND KOSHLYAK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 72970/13 and 12818/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 February 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Gryshko and Koshlyak v. Ukraine,…