The application concerns the alleged lack of respect for the applicants’ family life, inter alia, as a result of lack of enforcement of final court decisions, granting the first,
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF GHIMPU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – 24791/14. The case concerns the alleged failure by the domestic courts to protect the applicants’ dignity and reputation from attacks in a video aired by several TV channels
SECOND SECTION CASE OF GHIMPU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 24791/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 February 2022
CASE OF NOVAKOVIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6682/12
SECOND SECTION CASE OF NOVAKOVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 6682/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 February 2022
CASE OF TEGULUM S.A. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 53982/11
The case concerns the withdrawal of the applicant company’s right to exploit a limestone and gravel quarry. The applicant company complains of a violation of its rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention
CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 20253/09
The present case mainly concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment during his arrest and the failure to carry out an effective investigation, or to provide him with the required medical
CASE OF STRAISTEANU AND AGACHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 9204/08
The present case concerns alleged ill-treatment inflicted upon the second applicant while in detention and the carrying out of secret surveillance measures against the applicants.
CASE OF POVESTCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 33968/16
The case concerns the alleged failure to carry out an effective investigation into the applicant’s ill-treatment by private individuals, as well as the allegedly insufficient medical
CASE OF CRETU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 24737/15
The present case concerns the applicant’s ill-treatment during his arrest and the failure to carry out an effective investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment.
CASE OF MANANNIKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 9157/08
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction of an administrative offence for his failure to follow an order by the police to remove the banner which he displayed during a public event organised by others.
CASE OF KRAMAREVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 4418/18
THIRD SECTION CASE OF KRAMAREVA v. RUSSIA (Application no. 4418/18) JUDGMENT Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Fair balance between parties