The case concerns a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention in relation to proceedings in which it was decided not to lift a care order in respect of the first applicant’s two children, the second and third applicants;
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF EDZGVERADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 59333/16
The case primarily concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of the Convention that no effective investigation was carried out into her husband’s suicide which had taken place the day following his questioning by the police
CASE OF LUKOŠIN v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 25059/20
The application concerns alleged inadequate conditions of the applicant’s detention.
Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain – 15508/15 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section III]
Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 258 January 2022 Faysal Pamuk v. Turkey – 430/13 Judgment 18.1.2022 [Section II]
CASE OF MELEGA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 40427/18
The case concerns the reversal of a judgment of a first instance court by which the applicant was acquitted and his conviction on appeal without examining anew any evidence or hearing witnesses.
CASE OF ÇONGAR AND KALA v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 62013/12 and 62428/12
The applications concern the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicants owing to their inability to examine an anonymous witness at any stage of the proceedings.
CASE OF ADOMAITIS v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 14833/18
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention, that he did not have a fair hearing and was not able to challenge effectively the lawfulness of the interception
CASE OF ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 15508/15
The applicant complains under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention that he was denied a lawyer of his own choosing whilst being held incommunicado, and that for this reason he made self-incriminatory statements.
CASE OF KHUDOROSHKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 3959/14
The present case concerns a conscript’s suicide as a result of being subjected to hazing practices in the Russian Navy and the refusal of the applicant’s claim for compensation for her son’s death.