THIRD SECTION CASE OF KARUYEV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 4161/13) JUDGMENT Art 10 • Freedom of expression
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF FAYSAL PAMUK v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 430/13
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant owing to his alleged inability to confront in person four witnesses who had earlier made incriminating statements about him
CASE OF KOVAČ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6673/12
SECOND SECTION CASE OF KOVAČ v. SERBIA (Application no. 6673/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF APOSTOLOVSKI AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 28704/11and 2 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF APOSTOLOVSKI AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (Applications nos. 28704/11and 2 others) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2022
CASE OF DENISENKO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33842/10
The case concerns the interference with the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions following a decision of a court in the self‑proclaimed “Moldovan Republic of Transdniestria” (the “MRT”), which allowed B.
CASE OF PASHINYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22665/10 and 2305/11
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for his involvement in the protest movement that followed the disputed presidential election of 19 February 2008 and raises issues under Articles 5, 10 and 11 of the Convention.
CASE OF İNAL v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 28359/08
The application mainly concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings owing to the alleged failure of the domestic courts to examine the applicant’s challenges to the evidence in a manner compliant with the principle of equality
CASE OF KOMAROMI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30075/03 and 23 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KOMAROMI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Applications nos. 30075/03 and 23 others) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 18 January 2022
CASE OF LYUBOV VASILYEVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62080/09
The present case concerns the death of the applicant’s son during his compulsory military service and the subsequent investigation.
CASE OF NEVZLIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26679/08
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 3 of the Convention that his trial in absentia was unfair. The main issues are whether his defence had adequate time and facilities for preparation