The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision given against socially/State-owned companies. SECOND SECTION CASE OF ZEJNELOVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 26277/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF KIRTOK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 26193/20 and 9489/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KIRTOK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 26193/20 and 9489/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This…
CASE OF ARYSTARKHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 22948/20 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ARYSTARKHOV AND OTHERS…
CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13094/19 and 37726/19
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of their relatives. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13094/19 and 37726/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be…
CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 76201/17 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 76201/17 and 6 others – see appended…
CASE OF YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 68748/17 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of their relative. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 68748/17 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF BILYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 11356/17 and 45420/19
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BILYY v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF GÎLICE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 73408/16 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF GÎLICE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 73408/16 and 8 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF KALMYKOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 71325/16
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KALMYKOV v.…
CASE OF URH v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 60130/16
FIRST SECTION CASE OF URH v. CROATIA (Application no. 60130/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Urh v. Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights…