Having examined all the material submitted to it, the European Court of Human Rights has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF CHEREMSKYY v. UKRAINE – The application concerns the allegedly unlawful interference with the applicant’s right to freedom of assembly
The applicant complained that the local authorities and the courts had prohibited his peaceful assembly on far-fetched assumptions and their decisions had not been based on law, had not pursued a legitimate aim and had not been necessary in a…
CASE OF V v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC – The application concerns the death of the applicant’s brother, hospitalised in a psychiatric hospital following the use of a taser by the police and administration of a tranquiliser by a hospital nurse
European Court of Human Rights. Application no. 26074/18. Circumstances of the case: On the evening of 5 November 2015, a member of P.Z.’s family called an emergency line, stating that P.Z., who was 30 years old at the time, had…
CASE OF OSMANI v. ALBANIA – The domestic courts failed to give reasons in respect of the amount that the applicant was entitled to receive as compensation for the expropriation of his property
The case concerns a complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the domestic courts failed to give reasons in respect of the amount that the applicant was entitled to receive…
CASE OF H.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – The applicant complains that his expulsion to the Ein El-Hilweh refugee camp in Lebanon would put him at risk of mistreatment
The applicant complains that his expulsion to the Ein El-Hilweh refugee camp in Lebanon would put him at risk of mistreatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of attempts to recruit him to extremist armed factions operating…
CASE OF İLERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE – The applications concern the alleged inadequate conditions of the applicants’ detention, in particular overcrowding
The applications concern the alleged inadequate conditions of the applicants’ detention, in particular overcrowding. The applicants complain of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. Two applications also concern the placement of applicants in remote penal facilities, which allegedly…
CASE OF ŢÎMPĂU v. ROMANIA – The applicant complained that the national courts’ refusal to examine her objections to a local Archbishop’s decision to withdraw the endorsement that he had granted to the applicant to work as a teacher of religion
The applicant was a laywoman teacher of Orthodox religion at a secondary public school in Câmpulung Moldovenesc (“the school”) for twenty years. The applicant complained that the national courts’ refusal to examine her objections to a local Archbishop’s decision to…
CASE OF F.S. v. CROATIA – The case concerns the applicant’s expulsion from Croatia on national security grounds, without reasons being given
In March 2013 the applicant renounced his Bosnian-Herzegovinian citizenship and became stateless. Afterwards, he again applied for Croatian citizenship, in the context of which he was subject to security screening in accordance with the Security Screening Act. According to the…
CASE OF PADEIRINHA CARDOSO v. PORTUGAL – 42791/21
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF PADEIRINHA CARDOSO v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 42791/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Padeirinha Cardoso v.…
CASE OF S.B. v. NORTH MACEDONIA – The case concerns the alleged inability of the applicant to challenge evidence relied on by the domestic authorities in proceedings for her expulsion
The European Court of Human Rights observes that the Ministry’s decision of 9 March 2017 compelling the applicant to leave the respondent State simply stated that the measure was being taken on grounds of national security and contained no indication…