The case concerns the complaints about the banning of Scientology literature, the authorities’ refusal to register the Church of Scientology Moscow
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF DURLEŞTEANU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 25953/12
The applicants complained that the searches carried out in their home and professional office failed to comply with Article 8 of the Convention because
CASE OF IDRISOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19498/11 and 10 others
Between 2009 and 2017 the applicants were arrested on suspicion of belonging to illegal armed groups and having committed crimes of a terrorist nature
CASE OF ERSOY v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 13761/17, 13762/17, 21711/17, 21718/17, and 21722/17
SECOND SECTION CASE OF ERSOY v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 13761/17, 13762/17, 21711/17, 21718/17, and 21722/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 December 2021
CASE OF TSENTR PROSVETITELNYKH I ISSLEDOVATELSKIKH PROGRAMM v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 61214/08
THIRD SECTION CASE OF TSENTR PROSVETITELNYKH I ISSLEDOVATELSKIKH PROGRAMM v. RUSSIA (Application no. 61214/08) JUDGMENT
CASE OF TROITSKAYA-MIRKOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 38874/05 and 3 others
THIRD SECTION CASE OF TROITSKAYA-MIRKOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 38874/05 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 December 2021
CASE OF GRAŽULEVIČIŪTĖ v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53176/17
The applicant is a doctor and a clinical researcher. After one of her patient’s died, she was suspended. The applicant complains that the final court decision,
CASE OF SAMOYLOVA v. RUSSIA. The present case concerns the alleged dissemination of private information about the applicant on national television
The present case concerns the alleged dissemination of private information about the applicant on national television and the alleged failure of the domestic
CASE OF MELGAREJO MARTINEZ DE ABELLANOSA v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 11200/19
The present case concerns the applicant’s right to a fair trial in the framework of administrative law proceedings where, after his application concerning
CASE OF GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. The case concerns positive obligations under Articles 3 and 14 to carry out an effective investigation into serious allegations of ill-treatment motivated by homophobic reasons
The case concerns positive obligations under Articles 3 and 14 to carry out an effective investigation into serious allegations of ill-treatment motivated by homophobic reasons.