The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They also complained about poor conditions of transport
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42787/11
The applicant complained of deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of his detention. He also raised complaints under other provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13582/11 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GOROZHANKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13582/11 and 2 others – see appended list)
CASE OF ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 64733/09
The applicants complained that the delay in the registration and the subsequent dissolution of the Election Monitoring Centre had violated their right to freedom of association under Article
CASE OF JALLOW v. NORWAY – The applicant sought to be granted parental responsibilities for his child of whom he had never had custody, after the child’s mother had died
The case concerns complaints lodged with the Court under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention relating to proceedings through which the applicant sought to be granted parental
Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Derenik Mkrtchyan and Gayane Mkrtchyan v. Armenia – 69736/12 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]
Mironescu v. Romania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Mironescu v. Romania – 17504/18 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]
Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Genov and Sarbinska v. Bulgaria – 52358/15 Judgment 30.11.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – This case concerns the applicant’s arrest and detention for three days followed by his conviction for organising a one person protest in front of the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office involving a toilet seat and simulation of using it
SECOND SECTION CASE OF MĂTĂSARU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 53098/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021
CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – The case concerns the adequacy of medical care in detention and the hindrance of the applicant’s right of individual application
SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 60450/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2021