European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF S.AB. AND S.AR. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 17089/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of S.AB. and…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF RESIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities
The applicants complained principally of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 8 of the Convention. The European Court of Human Rights has already established, in an…
CASE OF ALBESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 23686/16 and 5 others
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ALBESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 23686/16 and 5 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial…
CASE OF FÎNAŢI v. ROMANIA – 14917/16
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF FÎNAŢI v. ROMANIA (Application no. 14917/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Fînaţi v. Romania, The…
CASE OF SHOLOMYTSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 12260/15 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention. Full text of the document. European Court of Human Rights FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SHOLOMYTSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 12260/15 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 November…
CASE OF PULNYEV AND GVALIYA v. UKRAINE – 67158/13
The case mainly concerns the first applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment and unlawful detention and the seizure of the second applicant’s property. On 5 April 2012 at about 6 a.m., several police officers approached the first applicant at a petrol station…
CASE OF DOVBYSHEV v. UKRAINE – 68447/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaint that an increase in the licence fees for his gambling business was in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The European Court of Human Rights concludes that the interference with the…
CASE OF ALSULA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA – 63975/10 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the Court’s well-established case-law. Full text of the document. European Court of Human Rights THIRD SECTION CASE OF ALSULA AND OTHERS…
CASE OF SKVYRASILRYBGOSP, VAT v. UKRAINE – 27128/11
The application concerns the allegedly unjustified extension in November 2010 of the time-limit for lodging an appeal against the judgment of the Kyiv Regional Commercial Court of 24 March 2010 finding for the applicant company in its claim to title to…
CASE OF GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA – 24225/19
The application concerns the State’s alleged failure to take adequate measures to protect the applicants from unlawful mob action, hate speech and other discriminatory actions by private parties in the context of their being prevented from opening a Muslim boarding…