The present case concerns complaints about pre-trial detention and house arrest and the right to compensation for the violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 38048/18
The present application concerns proceedings in which the domestic courts, basing their decisions mainly on medical expert opinions, divested the applicant
CASE OF KIKABIDZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 57642/12
The present application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicant. He complains under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (d)
CASE OF SÄRGAVA v. ESTONIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 698/19
The main issue in the present case is whether the domestic law was sufficiently clear and afforded the requisite safeguards for the protection of legal professional privilege
CASE OF MIKELADZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 54217/16
The present case principally concerns the applicants’ complaints that during their arrest and detention the police had physically and verbally assaulted them,
Spadijer v. Montenegro (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Špadijer v. Montenegro – 31549/18 Judgment 9.11.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF ALEKSANDROV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 44414/12
This case concerns civil defamation proceedings instituted against the applicant, a member of a municipal council, by the chair of an electoral commission following the applicant’s
CASE OF VLADIMIR REGIONAL PUBLIC ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEES AND DISPLACED PERSONS ‘SODEYSTVIYE’ v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53097/08
THIRD SECTION CASE OF VLADIMIR REGIONAL PUBLIC ASSOCIATION OF REFUGEES AND DISPLACED PERSONS ‘SODEYSTVIYE’ v. RUSSIA (Application no. 53097/08)
CASE OF SPADIJER v. MONTENEGRO (European Court of Human Rights) 31549/18
The present case concerns primarily bullying at work affecting the applicant’s psychological integrity and the failure of the relevant domestic bodies to protect her,
CASE OF IGNAT v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17325/16
The present case raises issues under Article 6 of the Convention and concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings opened against the applicant in so far as the appellate