The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF ALEKSEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 42856/16 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF NIKULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 28163/17 and 3 others – see appended list
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF METYOLKINA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 4827/11 and 4 others – see appended table
The applicants complained of the denial of access to higher courts in their cases.
CASE OF KUPAS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 24720/17
The case concerns the procedure for the return of a child to Switzerland, his habitual country of residence, which he left with his mother,
CASE OF CARMELINA MICALLEF v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23264/18
The case concerns the taking of property under successive titles, and eventually its expropriation. In particular, the adequacy of the compensation due on the basis of the Land Acquisition
CASE OF BANCSOK AND LASZLO MAGYAR (NO.2) v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 52374/15 and 53364/15
The cases concern the applicants’ sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of release on parole once they have served a forty-year term.
Šaltinytė v. Lithuania (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Šaltinytė v. Lithuania – 32934/19 Judgment 26.10.2021 [Section II]
León Madrid v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
The present request concerns the applicant’s request to reverse the order of surnames carried by his minor daughter. At the time of the facts,
Kindlhofer v. Austria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Kindlhofer v. Austria – 20962/15 Judgment 26.10.2021 [Section IV]