The case is about the applicant’s remand in custody for almost one year in the absence of a reasonable suspicion that she had committed the offence imputed to her.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF TOPLAK AND MRAK v. SLOVENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 34591/19 and 42545/19
The case concerns the alleged lack of adequate measures to allow the applicants, who had muscular dystrophy, to vote in the 2019 elections to the European Parliament
CASE OF ŠALTINYTĖ v. LITHUANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 32934/19
The case concerns alleged discrimination on the grounds of age when granting housing assistance and the reasoning provided by the domestic courts for refusing to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court.
CASE OF SERRANO CONTRERAS v. SPAIN (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 2236/19
The present case concerns the revision of the applicant’s criminal conviction after the Court’s finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in its judgment of 20 March 2012.
CASE OF KINDLHOFER v. AUSTRIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 20962/15
The present case concerns principally the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention that he had been deprived of a remedy against
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47045/06
The applicant alleged that his property rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention were infringed as a result of a new law which imposed
Act XXIII of 1979 amending Chapter 158 of the Laws of Malta – Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR
This Overview highlights judgments and decisions which either raise new issues or important matters of general interest.
Selygenenko and Others v. Ukraine (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 255 October 2021 Selygenenko and Others v. Ukraine – 24919/16 and 28658/16 Judgment 21.10.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF CHEMIMART LIMITED v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 29567/19
The present application concerns a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicant company,
CASE OF VINCZE v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 44390/16
The applicant complained under Article 11 of the Convention that his right to freedom of assembly had been unjustifiably restricted.